The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1396 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you. Again, that is helpful for our discussion. To start that, Lorna Slater wants to come in.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Who wants to take that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Absolutely. Lorna Slater, did you want to add anything further?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Do any examples stand out for you?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
I appreciate that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you—that was very helpful. Excuse me for interrupting you with that point of clarity.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
Okay.
I have a final set of questions for the witnesses. Is there anything that you wanted to say today that our questioning has not allowed you to emphasise to us? Also, as a final way of sharing your insights and knowledge, which have been extremely helpful, if you were in our shoes—if you were tasked with what we have been asked to do by Parliament—is there anything that you would definitely do? Alison, that is for you first.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
It is very helpful—thank you. This committee has been tasked with looking at the SPCB funded bodies, but it is important for us to look at that in the wider context of the landscape of public bodies in Scotland. It is good to have you here today, given your wide remit, although I appreciate what you said about the Accounts Commission. That is an important and interesting clarification and point of emphasis, because one could ask why there is a divide between what you audit and what the Accounts Commission audits. Have you ever considered why everything does not sit with you, as the Auditor General?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is interesting. We have both engaged with organisations such as the Scottish Commission on Social Security—SCOSS—so there are bodies that fulfil some aspects of that function. However, your argument is that there should be a comprehensive approach.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ben Macpherson
As the former Minister for Social Security and Local Government, I am very aware of that. It is helpful of you to set it all out for our evidence and as part of the discussion on the wider landscape, so I thank you for detailing the legacy and the nuance. Much of the scenario that the committee is considering relates to the position that has built up through legacy; we will get into more of that shortly.
In your written submission, interestingly, you categorise SPCB bodies as “less complex” in relation to audits. Can you comment further on how Audit Scotland ensures that the audit process for those less complex bodies is proportionate to their size and their complexity?