The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1249 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That was very helpful and succinct. Of course, those of us around the table in the Parliament are aware of what you have said, but it is helpful to get that on the record for our inquiry and our work.
The origins of your organisation are interesting. We can look back to the beginning of devolution, when there was a local government ombudsman, a health service ombudsman and a housing association ombudsman. In time, those roles came together. How does your organisation find operating across different policy areas? In local government, you look at the welfare fund and other issues, and you have functions relating to whistleblowing in the NHS. It would be interesting to hear any comments about public trust in that regard.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will build on some of that before I bring in Ash Regan. You said earlier that it would be helpful to be able to share information between ombudsmen and commissioners. You may have said everything that you want to say in response to Richard Leonard, but is there anything more that you want to add on barriers to sharing services?
I know that Richard Leonard touched on the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland, and I am interested in the Scottish Human Rights Commission, too. I would be interested to know how you work with those bodies. For example, last week they published a bit of work on independent living, which, of course, is related to local government. I wondered how you collaborate, given that there is some overlap there, although obviously you deal with complaints and they are more proactive and investigatory. I am interested in any thoughts that you may have on that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is very helpful. I appreciate that you handle final-stage complaints about the Scottish Human Rights Commission, for example. How do you go about dealing with complaints about other SPCB supported bodies?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is helpful.
You talked earlier about how many of the organisations are based in Bridgeside house in my constituency, and how that creates almost organic dialogue and sharing of insights. What about bodies like the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner and the Care Inspectorate? Are you ever in dialogue with them?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Ombudsman, is there anything that you would like to say that you have not had a chance to say in answer to any of our questions?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That provides really helpful context. Thank you very much. That leads us nicely to questions from my colleague Murdo Fraser.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is very helpful. Audit Scotland will give evidence to us and you have given us information that we might want to raise.
Richard Leonard wants to come back in.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you. If you want to follow up in writing with any further thoughts on that, that would be very helpful. I now turn to Ash Regan.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will bring Richard Leonard back in, in a second. You mentioned that currently all office-holders are individually audited and that there could be a saving if there was an opportunity for doing one audit for all office-holders. What challenges or opportunities in doing that do you want to highlight to us today, or as a follow-up, if that is more appropriate?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
We will consider that further. Thank you very much.
Richard Leonard raised a point about other ombudsman functions—both reserved and devolved. This is just a question of curiosity more than anything else, but are there cyclical moments throughout the calendar year at which you sit around a table together or have a call that the Government convenes? There must be so much opportunity for shared insight and learning. It is a cluttered landscape, which is partly why the committee has been charged with this SPCB work. I am interested to hear how you collaborate and communicate on a wide scale.
10:45