The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1241 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
As colleagues do not have any further questions, I will ask one last question. It is quite broad, but it is an important one.
You talked—quite rightly—about the need for organisations to ensure that they have resource for responding to freedom of information requests. I know from my experience how much time is taken up in responding to the important right to freedom of information. However, in recent weeks, there has been some discussion in the public and parliamentary domains about portfolio questions perhaps being overused and, arguably, irresponsibly used. Do you want to say anything about the responsible use of and engagement with freedom of information by parliamentarians, journalists and the general public, and about the impact of requests on your resources and those of other bodies?
If you have nothing to say, that is fine. I appreciate that that is a broad question, but I thought that it was relevant in the wider context of prudence.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Welcome back. I am pleased to welcome to the committee Dr Brian Plastow, who is the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner, and Ross MacDonald, who is the director of the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner’s office. Thank you for joining us, for your written submission and for your time.
We move directly to questions. As with other witnesses in recent weeks, the first question is from me. I would be grateful if you would set out what you consider to be the purpose of the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner and how that differs from the role of ministers, MSPs and other bodies that exist for the public and common good of Scotland.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
It does. It is also helpful context for the questions that colleagues will now put to you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
On that matter, the six key recommendations in your written submission were interesting and helpful. The last one is that
“Scottish Ministers and the Parliament should review the functions of all SPCB supported bodies every 5 years”.
Do you want to say a bit more about that? It is an interesting suggestion.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is really helpful, and I appreciate the candid way in which you put that forward.
I want to reflect on the evidence that you gave to the Criminal Justice Committee, which I sit on, and what you said in response to Lorna Slater about the different ways that biometrics are utilised and where and how they might be utilised in the future, in Scotland and internationally. You indicated to the Criminal Justice Committee that there might not be a necessity for your position in the future. For the record, do you want to say that again or to say a bit more about it, for the benefit of our committee?
11:15Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will ask about the review bodies. The bill provides for a review oversight committee and for case review panels to carry out the work involved in reviews. I would be grateful if you could outline the Scottish Government’s thinking in proposing that approach and the proposed membership of those bodies.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Section 11 and the schedule are quite specific about membership. Section 11 states that the review oversight committee must include
“representatives of voluntary organisations which provide services to individuals”.
However, it does not require that they have specific knowledge of domestic abuse. I am interested in any comment on that. The schedule discourages the appointment of people who are involved in victims organisations as chairs of the review oversight committee or case review panels. I am interested in fully appreciating the rationale for that.
10:30Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you for that, and thank you particularly for emphasising the point in paragraph 3(2) of the schedule about the restriction applying to the period of the year prior to the appointment. That is a key point for us to consider.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, and welcome to the third meeting in 2025 of the SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee. I have received no apologies for today’s meeting.
Under agenda item 1, the committee will take evidence from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, and I am very pleased to welcome Rosemary Agnew to the meeting.
We move directly to questions, and I will ask a general question first. What do you consider to be the SPSO’s role, and how does it differ from the role of ministers, MSPs and other public bodies?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Before I go to Lorna Slater, I have a question on the same topic. My other committee—the Criminal Justice Committee—is considering the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, which includes a proposal to establish a victims and witnesses commissioner for Scotland. There has been discourse in Parliament and beyond about such a role. If you were inclined to speak in similarly candid terms, given your experience and understanding, is that an area that you as an ombudsman could encompass as well?