Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 30 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 764 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

I have some questions about the Registers of Scotland (Fees and Plain Copies) Miscellaneous Amendments Order 2025. I thank Murdo Fraser, because the flock of sheep serves as a useful example. For a shepherd who wants to borrow against a flock of sheep, not only does registering need to be cost effective but—critically—so does updating the register in order to maintain accurate and current information on the asset that has been borrowed against.

I want to ask about the schedule of charges. You set out in your submission that, following consultation, you reduced the registration fee from £80 to £30. How was the level of £30 arrived at? Does the Government feel that that is the right level, given that the Law Society of Scotland, in its submission, points out that registration fees are considerably lower in other jurisdictions? The Law Society offers the examples of Australia and New Zealand, where the registration fee is about £7, while comparable situations, such as registering mortgages, or registering a company with Companies House, are charged at £15.

Although I understand that £30 is not an astronomical amount of money, it is still more than those sums. How was it arrived at, and what is the Government’s view on what the level of fee does with regard to ensuring that an accurate register is maintained?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

I was not asking about individuals.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

For free?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

Is a review and assessment of the fee structure programmed in once the new measures are up and running?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

My understanding is that that is what was discussed as the bill was progressing through the Parliament.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

In your statement, you referred to the cost for searches. That is an important element of the whole system: that people can quickly look at what registrations there may be. When the legislation was progressing, there was some discussion about providing free access to non-profit money advisers. I understand that that has not come forward. What is the Government’s thinking on that, and why has it not been included?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

Sorry, can I clarify whether you are saying that not-for-profit money advice organisations will be able to search the register.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

An associated point, which is related to the broad point about fees, is about the accessibility of the register, especially to businesses who may not necessarily be engaging armies of expensive lawyers. What work has been done to ensure that the register is easy to use and accessible to businesses that might seek to use it?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

I have a brief supplementary question about the flip side of that. If the deals were not talking to you, who were they talking to? You can base your answer on fact or on your sense of and feelings about dialogue. Were they talking to other big organisations or to Government?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Group

Meeting date: 16 January 2025

Daniel Johnson

Alors, bonjour, et je suis très heureux d’être ici.

I will do the rest in English, as I assume that that would suit the committee.