The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1001 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
With that, I think that the Economy and Fair Work Committee is demonstrating excellent productivity by dealing with our agenda ahead of schedule.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
Good morning, and welcome to the 27th meeting in 2025 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. This morning, as part of our pre-budget scrutiny, we will take evidence from the Deputy First Minister, Kate Forbes. Before we do so, I first note that we have received apologies—[Interruption.] I ask everyone to turn their phones to silent. I probably should have said that before. We have received apologies from Willie Coffey, and from Sarah Boyack, who is joining the committee, so we will defer item 1.
Agenda item 2 is a decision on whether to take business in private. I refer members to papers 1 and 2 in their information packs. Do we agree to take items 4 and 5 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
On agencies’ insight into regional approaches to what drives economic growth, I do not particularly disagree with the work that HIE and SOSE do. They do an important job on that agenda. However, although we would not want all our enterprise agencies reporting on exactly the same things—that would be counterproductive—we should surely have them reporting on some of the same things, so that we have some common points of reference. It strikes me that we do not really have that.
Secondly, beyond the metrics point, and looking at other countries, Sweden has been on a similar path. It has a comparable number of enterprise agencies, but it also has an explicit team Sweden programme, whereby each of the agencies has a clear understanding of how it interfaces with the others, to the point where each of them articulates that clearly and explicitly on their website. Could we use more comparable ways of understanding and measuring our outcomes? Should we, in a qualitative sense, be better at articulating where they fit and collaborate together, as well as the areas where they do their own thing, so to speak?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
No, and if we do have time, there are some issues around data points that it might be useful to talk about. However, we need to move on for now. I will bring in Lorna Slater.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
Before we move on, I have a couple of brief supplementary questions relating to the defence questions that came up. First, I was wondering whether you could share with the committee the detail that you seem to be referencing regarding supply chain companies. It would be useful if we could get that in writing and on the record; that would be an important bit of clarification.
I also have a direct question. A number of companies are designated as sovereign capabilities, which involves robust Chinese walls and separation. I believe that Leonardo is designated as such, as is Thales in Glasgow. Is that being taken into cognisance in how the policy is drawn up? Will those companies that are designated as sovereign capabilities be deemed as separate from their parent companies? That will have a significant bearing on how the policy will operate.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
I agree with that, but the point was not so much about the structures per se as about the data points and the comparisons.
Stephen Kerr wants to ask a supplementary question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
It is.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
I genuinely think that, in broad terms, we can all agree on the point about wanting to be more ambitious for Scotland and to be clear eyed about where the opportunities for improvement are.
I thank the cabinet secretary, Colin Cook and Aidan Grisewood for their contributions this morning.
We move into private session.
11:11 Meeting continued in private until 11:12.Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
Stephen Kerr would like to come in with a supplementary.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
So—