The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1194 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Despite your warning, Mr Stewart, I might ask a couple of brief questions to explore the issue a little further. Professor Robbie, is your contention that, if things that are permission based or licence based and are therefore within the scope and ambit of the state are quantised and turned into property, we could lose control over them? Is that at the heart of what you are saying might be the situation with carbon credits?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Mr McLardie, you touched on those two concepts. Are they sufficiently clear? Do they have sufficient purchase on this area of digital assets and electronic property?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you. With that, I would like to give the floor to Stephen Kerr.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
I will hand over to the deputy convener, Michelle Thomson.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Good morning, and welcome to the 35th meeting in 2025 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. Today, we will hold our third evidence session on the Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill. We have apologies from Lorna Slater, and Sarah Boyack may or may not make an appearance as she is moving amendments in another committee.
We are pleased to have with us this morning Greg McLardie, co-founder and chief executive officer of Two Hands; Professor Jill Robbie, professor of property law and the natural environment at the University of Glasgow; and Professor Burkhard Schafer, co-investigator at the Centre for the Decentralised Digital Economy—DECaDE. I ask our committee members and witnesses for concise questions and answers, to help us get through what previous evidence sessions have shown to be an expansive topic.
I will open up the questions. This is a short bill that essentially has the aim of bringing digital assets into Scots law. Do you feel that the bill takes the right approach, and does the way in which digital assets are defined work? The bill defines digital assets as things that arise from electronic systems and that are rivalrous because of the existence of an immutable record of transactions. It is important to make sure that those concepts work. Do you feel that taking the broad approach of using a narrow bill to simply bring digital assets into Scots law is the right thing to do, or do you feel that the bill should cover other aspects? I am happy to go to whoever would like to answer that question first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
What do you think the potential consequences of that are?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Greg McLardie, you were referenced, so I will turn to you next. First, the committee has noted that the bill seems to have cryptocurrencies and other such things in mind, yet we have a broad and expansive definition that is certainly not limited to those things. Is that a fair characterisation? Secondly, what are your thoughts in reference to what Professor Robbie has just set out?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
That is a really useful question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
I am sorry to intervene, but you have touched on some of the points that some of my colleagues might bring up on tokenisation. Thank you very much for those remarks, but I want to bring in Professor Schafer, and I then want to return to the points around terminology—particularly whether the terms “rivalrousness” and “immutability” are well understood.
Professor Schafer, do you have any thoughts on the overall approach? Given that I have flagged that I will ask about those novel concepts, do you also have any contributions on those?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
With that, we have come to the conclusion of our questions. I thank our witnesses for their very insightful contributions. You have given us yet more to think about—I am not sure that we are entirely thankful for that. We will go away and contemplate your evidence during our deliberations.
12:23 Meeting continued in private until 12:42.