The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1028 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
However, you understand that that makes it very difficult for us to carry out our scrutiny.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
How many unique visitors to your website does that equate to?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
No—that sounds like the number of views. It does not matter.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
In the previous year’s annual report, 18,767 views translated to 3,786 unique users. Maybe you could come back to us with that figure, but it is not important.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
Before I bring in our deputy convener, Murdo Fraser has a supplementary question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
I will come on to those points about engagement. From your response, it sounds as though you are measuring your influence on other parts of the public sector as an outcome, but are not measuring benefits to consumers. I think that most people would describe the former as an output rather than an outcome. In your opening statement, you described your objective as creating benefits to consumers in Scotland, but nothing in your answer really describes such benefits, unless I am missing something.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
Do you understand that, in terms of presentation, that is an issue for us? If we hear the chair of a board providing answers of a detailed operational nature, at least it is incumbent on us to ask whether there is an appropriate separation. This is not the first time that I have made that observation.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
Okay, so you have increased that proportion of your budget.
It strikes me that an awful lot of your answers have relied upon the work that you fund those organisations to do, as well as your investigations. However, you are still spending a substantial amount of money internally. Critically, of the money that is spent internally, only the money for two full-time equivalent posts is being spent on those investigations. Do you think that that balance of expenditure reflects the focus on outcomes that, overall, this committee is asking you to demonstrate?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
To cut through the subtext, people around this committee table can go to lots of places to get analysis and narration of public policy. However, when we see public money being spent, we want to see action and outcomes. That is our frustration. Particularly given that you stated that one of your top risks is stability, we wanted a clear demonstration of that.
Finally, Mr Wilson, it has been striking through this session that you have been the one providing a lot of the answers. When you have done that, you have used the word “we” an awful lot, in particular regarding quite detailed operational matters such as how the investigations and the research has been conducted and the effect that it has had. It is an important principle of governance that the chair and the board are independent of the body itself, so that they can provide oversight. That is particularly important, given that the public are trusting you to oversee the judicious use of public funds and taxpayers’ money.
Given your closeness and proximity to the body, do you believe that you have sufficient independence from the day-to-day operations in your role as chair of the board?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
In your annual report last year, you stated that one of your primary risks relates to stability of funding from the Scottish Government. Given that you will produce your annual report a matter of weeks before the Scottish Government will introduce its budget, how is the Scottish Government supposed to set its budget with confidence if it does not know how you have estimated your performance in the previous financial year?