The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1645 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Daniel Johnson
No other member has indicated that they wish to speak. Minister, do you have anything to add?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Daniel Johnson
I thank the minister for his contribution. We will now move into private session.
09:52
Meeting continued in private until 10:31.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Daniel Johnson
Thank you. I have indications that three members would like to ask questions.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
We now move to the final group of amendments. Amendment 103, in the name of Paul Sweeney, is grouped with amendments 104, 105, 69, 66, 140 and 106.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
Amendment 85, in the name of Paul Sweeney, is grouped with amendments 118, 60 and 25.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
Amendment 27, in the name of some character named Daniel Johnson, has already been debated with amendment 17. [Laughter.] I shall move the amendment.
Amendment 27 moved—[Daniel Johnson].
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 139 disagreed to.
Section 9—Guidance about community wealth building
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
It is, and we thank you for it, Mr Stewart, although we always enjoy hearing from you.
In closing, I would like to ask two final questions; the first is very specific and the second is more expansive. Does the Deputy First Minister recall that in the autumn I raised with her a point around thresholds for full accounts for charities, given her remit on social enterprise? I note that the Scottish Government raised the threshold to £1 million at roughly the same time—I do not know whether we should take credit for that or whether it was just a coincidence.
Notwithstanding that, £1 million is still considerably lower than it is for private businesses. For private businesses, the threshold is a turnover of £10 million and a balance sheet of £5 million or 50 employees. Given your remit, should we keep that under review? We should be encouraging social enterprises and the third sector, but that seems to be a disparity.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
You emphasised the need for our enterprise agencies to be nimble and efficient. I recently met SPRI, the Basque Country enterprise agency, which disburses grants of around €130 million and employs 80 people. I recognise that Scottish Enterprise is restructuring, but it employs more than 1,000 people. I also recently met Enterprise Singapore, which employs about 1,000 people, but it also supports small and medium-sized enterprises and undertakes a role that is Singapore’s equivalent to the British Standards Institution. Finland is a comparably sized country with a comparably sized scope, and Business Finland leads on innovation but employs fewer people. Do we really have the right balance between people and the money that goes out the door?
One thing that we struggle to get out of enterprise agencies is a clear articulation of how much money they get out the door versus how much they spend running themselves. Do we need to question those balances and whether we get the best bang for our buck from our agencies?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
Sorry: is there a question there?