The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1194 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
I am sure that your ministerial colleagues would love that response.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Our approach is that we want to be as diligent as possible and to pull that apart, which is why we have asked many of our questions.
Similarly, following on from Gordon MacDonald’s line of questioning, we have talked a bit about what might happen in other jurisdictions, particularly across the rest of the UK. There has been discussion about an expert group being formed. What sort of dialogue has been established between the Scottish Government, the UK Government and the other jurisdictions in the UK about making sure that we keep pace and input, because there will be overlaps as we go forward?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
It therefore remains for me to conclude the public part of our meeting. I thank the minister and the bill team. The bill team has been diligent in paying attention to our evidence sessions—the committee has noted that and welcomes it. I just wanted to put that on the record. I thank you for this morning and for the on-going work.
10:52 Meeting continued in private until 12:04.Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Good morning, and welcome to the 36th meeting in 2025 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. We are holding our final stage 1 evidence session on the Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill. We have received apologies from our colleague Murdo Fraser.
I welcome to the meeting Richard Lochhead, the Minister for Business and Employment, and his officials from the Scottish Government: Kieran Burke, bill team leader; Liam Hepburn, senior policy official; Fraser Gough, parliamentary counsel; and Emma Phillips, who is from the legal directorate.
I invite the minister to make a short opening statement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
I am tempted to ask Mr Gough more questions about the karmic nature of the law, but I will resist that temptation.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
With that, I bring in my colleague Sarah Boyack.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have a brief supplementary to that. Professor Robbie made a point about whether carbon credits should be specifically carved out in the bill. Her point was that, once you have created something as property, it makes it very difficult for the Government to exercise control, because of the nature of property rights.
I am certainly not expecting an answer this morning, but I would like to know whether the Government is reflecting on that specific point about carbon credits, given that it was raised by Professor Robbie.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
My question was not really about whether we need to do that; that need is relatively clear, for exactly the reasons that you set out. My question was more about why the bill uses the term “rivalrous” rather than using language such as “exclusive control”. Was there a particular reason for using that novel term, which is certainly not in common usage, as opposed to using a slightly longer-form but plainer-language definition to cover the point that it belongs to one person who controls what happens to it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Any Buddhist principles have been underexplored by the committee. I will ask a couple of additional questions, one of which draws on Kevin Stewart’s line of questioning. The bill simply establishes that digital assets are property under Scots law. I wonder whether one of the dangers is perhaps that we think about the big concepts, such as big corporate transactions or the future of technology, but are there considerations on that?
The legislation might well end up being important for things such as civil disputes, probate and divorce settlements. Should some considerations be made because of the nature of digital assets, which are different? For example, it is more possible for someone to say that they have lost access to a digital asset, such as an access key or what have you. In a divorce case going through the courts, you can imagine scenarios in which people might try to claim that they do not have the assets that it is claimed they have because they have lost the ability to access their digital assets and all their wealth.
I am not asking that specific question, but is there a need to examine any safeguards, procedures or technicalities in relation to the application of civil disputes, probate and divorce settlements, or other things that we think of as the nuts and bolts of Scots law and civil law, if the subject of those proceedings will be digital assets?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Finally—again—I recognise that the bill is unusual. It is focused and short, but some of the concepts that it deals with are expansive. Before we close the meeting, I invite the minister to say whether there are any issues or items that he wants to note that we have perhaps not touched on in the questions that we have asked.