The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Ruth Maguire
Are electoral registration officers required to write to inform an elector about a mismatched record only once, or is there a requirement for a follow-up if no response is received?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Ruth Maguire
Good morning, minister. In your remarks about the preparation of the guidance and your request that it come back to the committee, you confirmed that that will happen following the Scottish election, so it should not confuse matters for that election. In addition to the targeted communication to those who have existing absent voter arrangements, will there be a wider awareness-raising campaign?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Ruth Maguire
Will the member take an intervention?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Ruth Maguire
I broadly agree that MSPs should be held to the highest standards; I do not think that there would be any argument with that. However, my sense is that the public expects a just justice system, and the principle of innocent until proven guilty is a cornerstone of that. I think that that is where the issue is. Do you recognise the unfairness of not following the principle of innocent until proven guilty?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Ruth Maguire
As am I.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Ruth Maguire
I do not disagree with the intention or what Alex Cole-Hamilton says. However, does he acknowledge that we will have to be careful because, if we have a PVG scheme or PVG-type scheme, safeguarding and appropriate ways of working will still be required? If someone has been checked and passes—if that is the correct word—those checks, all that that gives is a snapshot. It says that the person has not committed certain crimes up to that time. It does not mean that—sorry, I am finding this difficult to explain.
Alex Cole-Hamilton said that he has had a PVG check and that sometimes people ask to speak to him alone. He would still have to be conscious that doors should be open, for his protection and for the individual’s protection. We need to be clear that no one thing will fix any potential worries that anyone ever has. Do you understand what I mean?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Why does there need to be a statutory obligation to formally consider proposals that are made by the Scottish Information Commissioner?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
You spoke a little about parliamentary committees potentially being able to designate bodies as public authorities. You have covered why you think that their being able to do so is appropriate, although you can add more to that if you wish.
The proposal would require there to be consultation before a resolution to designate bodies was passed. You will have heard the Scottish Government’s concerns about how proposals would be initiated and how the Parliament would assure itself that consultation was adequate. What process do you envisage for initiating resolutions and ensuring robust consultation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
So, you envisage it being in standing orders rather than—