The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 772 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Finally, Gordon, from your perspective as an information requester, if the presumption were there, might it encourage users to be more proactive in seeking reviews and appeals of decisions?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
I appreciate that point in relation to getting meaningful data from a survey. How will you know that officers are clear, following the mixed messages that there have been?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Good morning. I have some questions around communication. First, I welcome the clarity of your statement this morning and the acknowledgement that, previously, mixed messages were coming out of Police Scotland. In relation to communication to officers, many of whom will of course be impacted by crime as well as policing crime, can you give more detail on the date when the change in policy was communicated and how that was formed, please?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
I suppose so, yes—the main one. However, it might be helpful for the committee to hear whether the change was communicated in different ways and about the different pieces of policy that have changed.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
In terms of feedback, you spoke about an annual staff survey. What questions will be in the next staff survey to ensure that officers understand and are comfortable with the clear policy that you have laid out?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Good morning. We have had a conversation about how far the proposals will go in creating a cultural shift. If you have anything else to add about that, please do so, but I also have some specific questions for you, the first of which is about the duty to publish, which would replace the publication scheme duty that we have at the moment.
Juliet Swann, what are your reflections on how well the duty to publish would keep pace and be future proof? You said that a lot of our communications are now digital. We have already seen the use of questions that have been generated by artificial intelligence for freedom of information requests, and the public sector is involved in digital transformation at varying pace. Is the proposed duty future proof in your organisation’s eyes?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Good morning, minister. We understand that the action that is being taken is intended to remove any scope for confusion, but are there any risks associated with the extension that is being proposed? If so, how have they been assessed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Good morning. Thank you for your evidence so far. It has been very interesting.
I have some questions about replacing the publication scheme with a duty to publish. As has been spoken about this morning, many who responded to the committee’s calls for evidence advocated for a cultural shift in the way that public authorities approach proactive publication and the resourcing of FOI functions. I am interested in hearing panel members’ assessment of the readiness of the public sector in Scotland to implement that proactive duty to publish. What technical, financial or cultural support might be needed to make that shift effective?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
Thank you. On the consultation requirements for the new publication code, the bill says that the Scottish Information Commissioner must consult
“the Keeper of the Records of Scotland ... any Scottish public authority listed in schedule 1 or such persons as appear to the Commissioner to represent those authorities ... any person designated by means of an order under section 5 ... the Scottish Ministers, and ... such other persons as appear to the Commissioner to be relevant”.
Should any additional institutions or perspectives be included in the development process? I am mindful of what you have said about the time that it takes to do these things.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Ruth Maguire
The public interest benefit of proactive publication is probably widely accepted, but the committee will want to hear reflections on financial implications. Do the panel members have any assessment to share with us of the resources needed to implement the duty set out in the bill’s financial memorandum?