The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1884 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
Perhaps Fergus Colquhoun could build on that point about balance and where we might need to see more clarity in the bill.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
That is okay. If you have nothing more to add, I will move to Gail Watt.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you for that point and for your offer to provide further advice.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you. Does anyone else want to come in on that question?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
I will bring us back to net zero, because that was starting to sound like an interesting discussion.
We know that land and land use have the biggest role in Scotland’s emission of greenhouse gases. Do the owners of large landholdings have a moral and societal responsibility to promote net zero and climate change measures? If we agree on that point, is it reasonable to accept that there should be obligations on the biggest emitters to reduce their emissions? If so, how could the bill be strengthened and improved in that area? I am looking at Mr Macleod in particular.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
I do not want to push you beyond your remit, but I will go back to Don Macleod’s point that the polluter should pay. If we are looking at responsibilities and obligations, would it be fair to say that there should be an evidence base on the impact of certain activities? Is it better to look at it as being about ensuring that there is clarity on any impact and what should be an appropriate form of compensation or mitigation?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you.
Issues of local context and the role of ministers in making decisions have come up. How might the process be improved to take account of local context? Is it appropriate that ministers make the decision, or is there another way in which that could be done more proportionately?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
Just one, convener—it is on small landholdings. From the written submissions, I think that the Faculty of Advocates and the Law Society of Scotland are broadly supportive of the small landholders provisions, but in Turcan Connell’s—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
Okay. I will let you expand on that in a moment.
In contrast, the Turcan Connell submission raises concerns. You state that you disagree with those provisions and that
“The Bill introduces some rights for small landholders from croft tenure and others from 1991 act tenure which could result in”
unnecessary complexity. Can you expand on what rights you are referring to?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Monica Lennon
That is helpful—thank you.