The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3102 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Okay, but we are in 2024, and the Scottish Government declared a climate emergency back in 2019. I understand why you mentioned the need to be careful and the need for extensive consultation, but why, in 2024, five years after a climate emergency was declared, are your plans still out to consultation? Why are we still talking about the need to take people with us? Why is it taking so long?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Let me turn to another aspect of this, which is drawn out in paragraph 47 of the report, which tells us that the heat and building strategy progress report shows
“a spend of £170 million”.
Have you undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of that spend?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much indeed for that evidence session. It has been very useful. There might be some issues on which we need to follow up, but I think that you have furnished us with comprehensive answers to the questions that we have put to you. I thank Sue Kearns, Catherine Williams, Kersti Berge and the director general, Roy Brannen, for their time this morning.
I will suspend the meeting to allow for a change of witnesses.
10:12 Meeting suspended.Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Welcome back. The second public evidence session this morning is on the Auditor General’s section 22 report “The 2022/23 audit of the Scottish Prison Service”, one dimension of which is consideration of the operation of the contract that is run by GEOAmey. I am pleased to welcome our witnesses, who are from GEOAmey. We are joined by David Jones, the managing director; James Huntley, the commercial and finance director; and Gavin Redmond, the account director for the Scottish court custody and prison escorting service. You are all very welcome.
We have some questions to put to you but, before we get to those, I invite Mr Jones to make a short opening statement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
We will move things along. I invite Colin Beattie to put some questions to you. Mr Huntley, I do not know whether you were preparing to answer one of those questions, but perhaps you could respond to Mr Beattie’s questions.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
You appear to concede that there may be a human rights-based case, but your position is that, as a company, GEOAmey has no liability. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Is it up to individual crews to phone ahead to the court and say, “We’re going to be eight hours”, “We’re going to be two hours delayed” or “We’re not going to make it today at all”, or do you have some kind of central operational hub from which you make those calls?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Wow.
11:15Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Okay, but you have said that, back in 2020, the hourly rate of pay for your officers—throughout today’s proceedings, you have called them “officers”, which conveys a certain level of status to them—was less than £10. You might be surprised, but I am not surprised, that people would leave in droves if they were given opportunities to find work that paid more than that, given the kind of job that this is.
I presume that, when you put in your tender document, it was based on a forecasted hourly rate of pay, which, at the time, I can only assume, was also less than £10 an hour.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Richard Leonard
It has been a bone of contention, certainly in the past, that your rates of pay on the contract in England were more than your rates of pay on the contract in Scotland. Is that correct?