The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3424 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
I read somewhere that it was closed in May 2025.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
To what extent did you get help and support from the Scottish Government’s central legal services?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
The deputy convener, Jamie Greene, has some questions.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. You are proving why it would be useful for us to be able to visualise the site and its component parts.
I will take you back to the financial management element of the reinstatement of the funicular. In 2020, Audit Scotland produced a section 23 performance report that cited a figure from a meeting in February 2020, when the board considered that the cost of basically tearing up and removing the funicular would be £13.3 million, and the cost of reinstatement was estimated at £10 million to £15 million at that time. That was February 2020, which we all recognise as being the point at which the pandemic set in, and we know that the world changed quite a lot after that.
I will move us forward to the note that you helpfully supplied to the committee, which cites a reinstatement cost figure of £20.5 million. I have also seen a January 2023 figure giving a capital cost of £25.4 million. Will you talk us through that? You told us that you have paid £70,000 to the contractor Balfour Beatty, which is paying for the current work. Who has had to bear the burden of that cost inflation? Is it HIE or the subsidiary? Is it the constructor or the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
That is fine. I will now bring in Colin Beattie.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
I now invite Keith Brown to put some questions to the witnesses.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
The question that is provoked by the evidence that Fiona Brannigan has given to us is, “But which communities?” Some communities will be better organised, more articulate and better resourced—they could possibly have professional legal support—than others. The message that I have taken from the evidence so far is that there needs to be an equalisation. The criteria that are applied might need to reflect need rather than simply property values.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
Parliament passed the Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act in 2009. However, in paragraph 23 of the report, you make the point that
“The Scottish Government did not introduce a way to monitor progress in addressing flooding in communities.”
The outstanding question, then, is whether the Scottish Government has introduced ways of monitoring progress in addressing flooding in communities, in the context of the flood resilience strategy. Have lessons been learned? Do you get a sense that more oversight is in place or that there is a monitoring system to ensure that the right decisions are being made and the right priorities followed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
Our next agenda item is a mini-inquiry into the Cairngorm funicular railway. I am very pleased to welcome our witnesses to the committee. From Highlands and Islands Enterprise, we are joined by Stuart Black, the chief executive; Sandra Dunbar, director of corporate services; and Elaine Hanton, the Cairngorm programme lead. We are also joined by representatives from Cairngorm Mountain (Scotland) Ltd, which is a subsidiary of Highlands and Islands Enterprise. I am pleased to welcome Mike Gifford, the chief executive; and Tim Hurst, a board member and the former interim chief executive.
We have some questions to put to you, but before we get to those, I invite Mr Black to make a short opening statement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Richard Leonard
Those are routine maintenance shutdowns. They are not to address substantive structural engineering issues.