The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
You have powers of statutory investigation. Do you have powers of statutory enforcement?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Yes. We are allowed to comment on that, but I recognise that you may not be.
I will turn to a couple of more technical questions that I hope that you will be able to answer in full. There are issues around measurement and reporting mechanisms. What are the gaps in the current reporting mechanisms that you use? Are there obstacles that you have identified? How are you, as the ombudsman, addressing those?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Is your performance captured, recorded and publicly available?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Yes. The other question that I wanted to ask if we had the time is about the measures that you have implemented to make sure that your office functions well within the landscape around public bodies, commissions and commissioners. Can you comment on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much indeed. This has been a very useful session for us. The point of it was to shed light. At times, we have had a bit of heat, but I think that we have had a fair amount of light as well. Mr Miller, it is important that the points made collectively by our witnesses are on the public record, to ensure that they are clear for all to see.
As we discussed, you will perhaps supply us with further information. Mr Irwin, we are looking forward to Friday, when documents on due diligence will be produced. We might get back to you in the light of our having read those. We will also reflect on your invitation to revisit the yard. I think that there might be some benefit in our doing so, but that will be for the committee to decide.
I thank all our witnesses. We wish you luck with your continued endeavours. We want you to succeed, which is why we sometimes ask quite difficult questions.
11:56 Meeting continued in private until 12:25.Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
I am now going to invite Stuart McMillan to put questions to you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Those waiting with bated breath for Stuart McMillan’s thoughts on these matters will have to wait a little bit longer, because I am going to invite Colin Beattie to put some questions to the witnesses.
10:45Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
No. I am asking you a direct question, Mr Miller.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. This will be my final point before I ask our deputy convener to come in. The other thing that Mr Tydeman said was about the arrangement whereby the individual who was on secondment set up a private limited company and so on. Mr Tydeman said to you, Mr Dishon, in February 2024 that he had questions about the IR35 assumptions surrounding that arrangement. Did he raise those with you at that point?