The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3197 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
Good morning, and welcome, everyone, to the 26th meeting in 2022 of the Public Audit Committee. The first item on the agenda is a decision on whether to take agenda item 3 in private. Do members agree to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
The principal item on our agenda is consideration of the section 23 report prepared in March this year by the Auditor General for Scotland entitled “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”.
I welcome our witness, the Rt Hon Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister. We have a number of questions to put to her, but I ask her to start off by making a short opening statement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
Okay. The three questions were responded to with answers that constituted 150 words. The last time that I wrote to Keith Brown, it was on two subjects. When I wrote to him about the fatal accident inquiry relating to Allan Marshall, he responded in 1,000 words, and when I wrote to him about the Miners’ Strike (Pardons) (Scotland) Bill, he responded in 866 words.
Do you think that a reply that constitutes just 150 words is a satisfactory response to the serious inquiry that is being carried out by the Parliament?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
You mentioned your Government’s decisions, and one matter that is of interest to the committee is what was brought to Cabinet. Was the preferred bidder announcement taken to Cabinet, or were the unconditional financial guarantee of £106 million to CMAL, the £45 million bail out of FMEL, the financial collapse of FMEL or the nationalisation decision taken to Cabinet?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
Before I bring committee members in, I seek clarification on a couple of points. First, in your foreword to the Scottish ministerial code, you say:
“it is essential to set and maintain the highest standards of propriety and openness for Government Ministers.”
Do you think that Keith Brown’s response to the committee on 18 October meets those standards?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
Do you think that he answers the questions that the committee put to him?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
Okay. Well—
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
Okay. However, we got that letter only because it was provided to us by Stuart McMillan.
I will ask another question on the issue of transparency. When we took evidence from Audit Scotland back in April, Gill Miller said:
“We asked Transport Scotland and the Scottish Government for all documentation relating to the minister’s decision, but we did not receive any.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 21 April 2022; c 28.]
Is that in keeping with the standard that you set out in the foreword to the ministerial code?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
I appreciate your undertaking to listen to any requests that we have for further information to be put in the public domain.
You mentioned the missing documents and so on. However, the position of Audit Scotland remains clear. It says that the email that was unearthed that covers the exchanges on 8 and 9 October 2015 confirms that ministers approved the award of the FMEL contract. Audit Scotland’s position is that
“there remains insufficient documentary evidence to explain why the decision was made to proceed with the contract, given the significant risks and concerns raised by CMAL.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Richard Leonard
Okay. The committee will consider its next steps after today.
I will move on to something else. Another response that we received recently—in fact, just last week, so it therefore arrived a week late—was from Transport Scotland. In the covering letter, Michelle Quinn, the chief executive officer of Transport Scotland, said that the organisation has a “commitment to absolute transparency”.
However, the correspondence that Transport Scotland shared with us was an incomplete, censored version of Derek Mackay’s letter of 2 February 2015 to Stuart McMillan. It was not even redacted; it was cut. Was that done to mislead? I do not know. Do you think that that is an acceptable way for a Government organisation to act?