The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3519 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Richard Leonard
We are a bit pushed for time, so we cannot go into too much detail about particular projects. We have questions about specific projects, so we will come back to those in the course of the discussion over the next three quarters of an hour.
Willie Coffey has some questions.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Richard Leonard
I will pick up on that theme. Sharon Dowey mentioned the bus priority improvements under the future transport fund. I presume that that involves building bus lanes and ensuring that buses get priority in traffic, even across the Sheriffhall roundabout.
When we look at the budget headings, we see that the planned expenditure on that was £495 million, but only £26 million has been spent. There is £300 million in the budget for Scotland’s heat network, but only £6.4 million has been spent. There is £26 million in the budget for the low-carbon manufacturing challenge fund, but only £750,000 has been spent. There is a planned spend of £180 million on the emergency energy technologies fund, but only £10 million has been spent.
I do not want to miss out Mr Signorini. The peatland underspend has been a bit of an issue as well, has it not? I know that Rhoda Grant has written to the cabinet secretary, who has confirmed that the underspend on peatland restoration in 2020-21 was £12 million and that it was £7.4 million in 2021-22. Why is there such slow progress in those areas?
10:30Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Who will own those charge points in the future?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Thank you—fair enough. Just one other thing from me before I go to Bill Kidd again, and that is a question about the assessment and cost benefit analysis that is made on road improvement projects such as on the A83 or whatever it is. How do you reconcile that with the net zero targets? What criteria is used in order to say, “Yes, that’s going ahead,” or, “No, that is not going ahead.” What criteria is used in order to say, “Yes, that’s been prioritised,” or, “No, that’s been deprioritised?”
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Thank you. That was very helpful.
Can I ask each of you if you have got any reflections on the recent Audit Scotland report that spoke about the extent to which there is joined-up working across Government in pursuit of net zero targets?
I will read out a couple of the conclusions from the report. The Auditor General said:
“The Scottish Government does not routinely carry out carbon assessments or capture the impact of spending decisions on its carbon footprint in the long term.”
He also said:
“The Scottish Government does not assess how far the policies outlined in the Climate Change Plan Update will contribute to net zero.”
Finally, he said:
“The Scottish Government does not know how much the policies proposed in the current Climate Change Plan Update will cost”.
Do you think that that is a fair assessment? We will start with Alison Cumming.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Before I move on to Craig Hoy, I note that when we took evidence last year from Transport Scotland, it described the situation as it was then as “a fairly narrow point” and, again, said:
“it is a narrow point about the evaluation of assets.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 24 March 2022; c 14.]
Is that how you would characterise it?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Okay. Thanks. In his opening remarks, Professor Alexander talked about the organisation considering “our purpose”. I think that most of us would consider the primary purpose to be to carry out audits of public bodies. From those figures, it appears that you are not making the progress that we would want to see. I would like to understand from you the extent to which that is to do with timeliness issues among the bodies that you are auditing versus timeliness issues in your own organisation.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Do you know when you will get back to pre-pandemic levels of completion?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Good morning. Key message number 1 in the report says:
“We are making progress in returning the timeliness of our financial audit to pre-pandemic timescales but have more work to do.”
As I read them, the figures in the report are that, two years ago, 82 per cent of audits were delivered to schedule. A year ago, it was 75 per cent, and in this report, it is 51 per cent. That does not sound to me like progress, but perhaps you could explain those figures.