The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3268 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Can I take that away? I do not want an arbitrary trigger that would leave us in the same situation of having a target that is not measurable. Maybe we can bottom that out. I will speak to my officials, and we can speak about whether that is doable.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
The premise of your question is that the Scottish Government cannot meet its offshore wind ambitions, but, in fact—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
I am not quite sure how to answer that. The fact remains that the Scottish Government has responsibility for inshore areas and the UK Government has responsibility for offshore areas.
That exemplifies why it is important that the UK Government, as well as the Scottish Government, takes into account the net zero goals and the biodiversity goals. Interoperability between the four nations is extremely important, because biodiversity does not have boundaries—species do not have boundaries. We all have to work together to—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Good environmental status is a UK-wide endeavour, if that answers your question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Yes. In my response to Emma Harper, I explained why such alignment could be very important. Obviously, we would want there to be alignment so that we do not have a gap. Guidance is, of course, not legally binding, but it is sensible to provide it if there is a gap. I will take advice from my official, who looks as though she might have something to add.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
No. The target-setting criteria are as I laid them out. We want alignment with the biodiversity strategy and the global biodiversity framework. The target-setting criteria were set out for the bill, with all the alignments. There had to be criteria for setting the targets. It is not a case of not bringing anything new; it is about the target-setting criteria being interwoven into all the other biodiversity goals, outcomes and frameworks to ensure that the targets are robust, measurable, realistic and achievable.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Yes—exactly. I come back to the point that we cannot just set arbitrary targets; there have to be criteria behind the targets, and they have to be grounded in all the other strategies that have been followed to get us to 2030, to halt biodiversity decline, to become nature positive and to have species restoration by 2045.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
That is why I was a bit confused.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Happy days.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
As you rightly say, it comes back to partnership working and the co-ordination of data. We have identified that there are a few streams of work in some of the bodies that already exist in Scotland, such as NatureScot, which is supporting local environment record centres, for example. It has a budget associated with that of just over £220,000. We engage with and collect and use data from our academic institutions, which are already funded by the public purse. Data also comes in from various third sector organisations, which might involve citizen science as well. We can look at impact assessments, particularly for the target setting, and whether any additional funding is needed once we have set the targets.
It is important to mention that it is not just the bill or my portfolio that have actions to improve data. I am particularly pleased that, recently, the Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands and I have jointly budgeted for light detection and ranging data to be collected across Scotland. I am very excited about what the surveys that have been done as part of that will yield. I believe that the planes have already been out to record data on what is actually happening in Scotland’s landscape. That will inform a lot of the work that we do on biodiversity, peatland restoration, the health of some areas and the forestry that is associated with some areas.
It is not just in the bill that there is spend. Data is associated with the actions that the nature restoration fund generates, too. If anything specific arises as a result of the target setting that happens under secondary legislation, we would, of course, have to look at how we would fund it.