The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2963 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
How do we overcome the risks? Is it simply by just moving very slowly?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
The previous panel seemed to feel that we were further on than that and that we actually knew more about the fostering side of things than we did about the residential side.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
Okay. My final question is about the financial memorandum as a whole. On the specific point about profit limitation in residential services, I see that there is a cost to the Scottish Administration in 2026-27 and 2027-28—and then nothing at all after that. That surprises me a little bit, because surely there would need to be on-going supervision. What are your feelings about the financial memorandum? Is it a bit light, as I think the previous panel suggested? Is that your feeling, too?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
You heard what I said in the debate last night, minister. It seems to me that, compared with other bills, this one is all about money—money is central, whereas we sometimes have members’ bills in which money is more at the periphery.
I am interested in the pilot, but we do not have time to go into that today. My question is whether there is room for compromise. If the Government has £5 million or £6 million available, could that money not be used to top up what is presently happening? Lots of parents can afford to pay and are paying for their kids to go. It seems to me that the real problem is whether we can get money to the families and the kids who cannot afford to go. That £5 million or £6 million would make a huge difference. I accept that it would have to be every year and not just for one year.
Could the Government make some kind of offer to put in £5 million to £6 million every year for 10 years or whatever, on the condition that Liz Smith pulls her bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
I will start with a question for Ms Duncan. If you want to refer it to anyone else, that is okay.
I want to discuss the whole issue of excessive profits in the sector, especially when it comes to residential care. Do you think that excessive profits are being made? Do you think that what the bill proposes, which I think is to give Government the power to do something, not to actually do something, is reasonable?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
Can I just interrupt you? Surely that is true of the whole public sector. No company—whether it is building a bridge across the Forth or anything else—should be making excessive profits, because that also takes money away from kids, schools and so on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
It is helpful to understand that.
I will ask a round-up question, because I do not think that anyone is asking about the financial memorandum as a whole. It says that, once things settle down in 2029-30, we are talking about between £20 million and £23 million a year. A big chunk of that is aftercare—I accept that you do not like that term—and some of it is for chairing and running the hearings; the third aspect is advocacy. Do you think that, overall, that is a reasonable figure, or it is seriously over or under the actual cost?
10:45Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
I will move to asking about money, profit and that side of things. Ms Burns, you made the longest of all the contributions that I saw on that issue.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
I should add that you were thorough, so I will start with you.
First, do we have enough data? Do we know what profits are being made? What are your general thoughts on that? Are profits always bad?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
John Mason
Can you expand on that? Do we know why the provision suddenly appeared after not being spoken about beforehand?