The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3658 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
On public sector pay, there is the whole question of the 9 per cent uplift target. Quite a lot of that has gone in the first two years. What are your expectations around that?
09:45
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
The committee is very keen on zero-based budgeting, although I am not quite as committed to it as other committee members. I understand that it is quite a resource-intensive process, and you need accountants and other people to do it. If you are going to strip everything right back and look at everything again, that is a costly process. It takes resources, does it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
The problem that I have with zero-based budgeting is that we have certain major assets, such as hospitals, which I presume we will carry on with, so there is no point in taking everything back to zero. However, there are some areas that we can look at more than others.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
I have just one area to ask about, which is public inquiries. As you probably know, the committee did an inquiry into inquiries and published a report. My question is whether timescales and budgets can be controlled. A specific case is that when the UK Government launched its inquiry into what are commonly called grooming gangs—networks of child sexual abuse and exploitation—it put a budget and time limit on it, but the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills was not keen to do the same for Scotland. Can you clarify the legal position and what powers we have in that space?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
I presume that, if inflation looks unpredictable, the trade unions and others will not be keen on multiyear settlements, because they will not know—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
That takes me on to another question. Can we expect efficiency savings to be evenly distributed across the board? We have an increasingly elderly population, so we need more people on the social care side rather than fewer. The police and fire services had a major reform, which I supported, and that has been good. Their argument might be that they have had a major reform, so it is now up to other sectors to have major reforms.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
You used the word “front-line” twice, and the convener mentioned it before. Does that mean that all the accountants will lose their jobs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
You have already been asked about the MIM and the idea of revenue-based investment. I was in Glasgow City Council when we did the schools PFI programme. That was presented as the only game in town, but, when we look back on it, we see that it has been incredibly expensive, although, as you have pointed out, we got the schools quicker. If we had used traditional funding, we would have had to wait longer for the schools. I accept that there is a challenge in that, but I remain sceptical and think that we are going to pay over the odds.
In a way, all these things are just devices to get round the fixed borrowing limits. I do not understand why Westminster sets those limits when, in effect, it can borrow as much as it wants.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
I know. It is easy to look back at PFI and say what a bad deal it was, but, at the time, we thought that we were getting a better deal. Glasgow followed Falkirk, so we tried to learn from its mistakes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
John Mason
I will not spend too long on this, but the accounting rules have changed. PFI was a device to get around the borrowing limits. The rules have now changed and we have a whole range of different funding models. I accept that those models allow us to get the asset more quickly, but it feels to me as though future generations will be paying more for the asset than they would if we could borrow the money for it.