The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3647 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
You said that I was healthily sceptical, so I will continue in that vein.
We have looked at all sorts of things, including commissions, and the point has often been made that there is a need for public inquiries because there is a lack of trust in the public sector. However, the confidence that people have in the SFC—along with others, such as the Auditor General—is exceptional. That is very commendable, and all of you are to be thanked for creating that position, which we want to continue.
Returning to my healthy scepticism, there is a section in your report on the impact of UK Government fiscal decisions. I am interested in that whole space, which we have touched on previously. We can plan all we like, and we can believe that we have a certain deficit or budget gap, only for the situation with regard to winter fuel payments, the two-child limit mitigation or welfare reforms to suddenly change. How do we get the balance right in that regard?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
:On the issue of the population ageing, I am just wondering how much I should worry about that—obviously, I am ageing and am about to retire, so that is one angle. More widely, however, we have figures for the percentage of the population that is between 16 and 64, which traditionally was the working-age population. I guess that we will continue to use that demographic so that we can compare the situation with previous years? Is that right?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
:Is the health service different in that you have to put more money in almost to stand still, especially if we have an ageing population and all the other factors you have mentioned?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
:Your specialism is more in modern apprenticeships and things like that. I am not sure how many modern apprenticeships there are at the moment. Do you have a target for there to be more of them, or is that too simplistic a question?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
:If the number were to be 6,000, for example, are you saying that it should be 9,000 or 12,000? Do you have a number in mind?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
:I presume that varies a lot, depending what the skill is.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
:All the models are more expensive than either taking it straight out of taxation or using the slightly more expensive traditional borrowing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
:In other cases, it can go up to
“2.6 to 3.3 times the construction cost”.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
:That is fair enough. The convener also spoke about the performance level of several key public services falling. Let us take health as an example. There are long waiting lists. Is that necessarily because the health service is failing, or is it because people’s demands and expectations are increasing? It is good that there is more discussion about mental health than there used to be. There may not be an increased need for mental health services but there is certainly an increased realisation of that need. Obesity, which was not around so much when I started my working life, seems to have increased. Can we differentiate between demand increasing, on the one hand, and the service failing, on the other?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
John Mason
:On productivity, is it inevitable that the health service will always be more people intensive? I have an issue with my eye and, when I go in for a test, I see somebody to do with distance, somebody else to do with pressure and somebody else who gives me an injection. It is quite hard to see how the health service could cut down the number of people involved in such things.