The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3214 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
It sounds good to have a bit more informal contact, understanding, relationships and all that kind of stuff. However, the reporter will still have to write a report, will they not?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
I have a slightly wider question on the bill’s financial memorandum. Pam Duncan-Glancy and others have touched on aspects of that already.
As I understand it, the three big bits of money are for extending aftercare, for increasing advocacy services and for children’s hearings, the latter of which is primarily about paying the chairs.
How comfortable are you with the figures? I am looking at the final column, covering the year 2029-30, by which time everything should have settled down and stabilised. There is a figure of £7.4 million for aftercare. However, there seem to be a lot of questions about how much aftercare will be needed, because we cannot predict the demand. Similarly, there is between £5.3 million and £7.2 million for advocacy services. How certain are you of those figures?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
Can you clarify what figures the local authorities gave you? Did they represent what they currently spend on aftercare or what they think they might spend on it in future?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
We have had evidence to suggest that the area of grounds hearings and the role of the reporter is becoming quite complex. Sheriff Mackie said that grounds hearings can become very difficult and confrontational and that cases in which grounds are not opposed would best be dealt with by a system that was more administrative, which would avoid the need for a hearing. Do you agree? Is that a possibility?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
Sheriff Mackie said that the bill stops short of introducing a more administrative system, and, instead, reinforces the existing system.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
I am not expecting you to know how many people are going to need or ask for aftercare, but I suggest that that is a very uncertain figure. Do you agree?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
I will leave it at that, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
I suppose that we all have some of the public inquiries on our minds. If, for example, the chair of a public inquiry gets too close to one party or another, there can be at least the perception of a problem. That is perhaps what is being flagged up here: that the reporter could be swayed or something.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
As far as I can see, Sheriff Mackie, who is the expert on some of this, is struggling to understand how what you are proposing will work, and the rest of us are definitely struggling with that, too.
With regard to the role of the reporter, it has been suggested that there could be a conflict of interests for the reporter in meeting the child or the family earlier on than is presently the case. One witness suggested that the child might incriminate themselves if they meet the reporter earlier on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
John Mason
Is it just advocacy, or would there be a need for legal representation in some cases?