The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3569 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Should we just say that sustainability of local government should be a priority for it, without going into any more specifics? Do you think that that is the way that we should—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Michael Marra is arguing against the levy, and I have some sympathy for that, but is the fault not at Westminster, which has brought in such a levy in England and, effectively, put us into a corner whereby we have to do so as well, when it would have been better just to put it on to corporation tax or something like that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Well, the charge will be passed down the line. I know that the Government’s argument is that land prices would fall because of the bill, but I am sceptical about that, and the committee heard from witnesses who were also sceptical about it. I think the charge will be passed down the line to whoever ends up being the end user, as happens with a tax such as VAT.
I would like the Government to agree to the amendments. If they need a bit of tweaking at stage 3, we could certainly do that, but agreeing to them now would set out the principle. The idea that homelessness residential places might be affected—that someone would build a hotel and it would immediately be filled with homeless people—seems very unlikely, but perhaps that could happen. I hope that the minister will agree to the amendments. If they need to be tweaked, they could be tweaked later on.
11:00
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
No.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
I note that the member includes the term “housing emergency” in his amendments. Is there a legal definition of that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Amendment 31 would set a base level—it could be higher or lower than that—and we will see what the Government thinks about it. Patrick Harvie is correct that we do not need to include any reliefs or rates in the bill and, overall, that is what is happening. However, I want to pass on the point that the Scottish Property Federation suggested to me—I agree with it, because I see it happening in my constituency—that setting a level would set a marker that indicates that we want to take action on brownfield land.
I move amendment 30.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
I welcome the minister’s flexible and balanced approach, as I think that he described it. It is interesting to see how different ministers handle amendments at different committees, and I welcome Ivan McKee’s approach to the issues.
That is great in relation to amendments 30 and 31. I tend to agree with Ivan McKee on amendment 32. The word “viability” jumped out at me as being somewhat subjective. It would open up a huge amount of possible loopholes for developers, and also complexity. I therefore agree with the minister and will oppose amendment 32.
I press amendment 30.
Amendment 53 not moved.
Amendment 31 moved—[John Mason]—and agreed to.
Section 11, as amended, agreed to.
After section 11
Amendment 32 moved—[Craig Hoy].
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
I certainly think that not enough is being done, but the question is who should do it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
I think that Edinburgh, in common with other cities internationally such as Venice and Barcelona, is swamped with tourists at certain times of the year, especially in August during the festival. To be frank, I struggle to get a hotel room for under £100 a night in Edinburgh—although I can easily get that in London—so I do not think that there is much danger of losing all the tourists.