The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3658 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
I will build on that a little. If we were to speak to our successor committee, should we be saying, “You need to be a bit more blunt with people?” Should politicians be more blunt and say, “We’ve got hard choices to make”, or are politicians just victims of what is happening in society?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
There may be one or two things in that category.
I will ask a question on social security, in relation to the adult disability payment. More people are exiting the scheme than was expected. I did not quite understand why people would be exiting the scheme. Is it because they have got better or they have got a job? They should get the payment whether they get a job or not, should they not?
11:15
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
It is good that the valuation is more accurate—fair enough.
I note that
“The Deputy First Minister, Economy and Gaelic portfolio will receive £127.4 million of budget cover for other technical adjustments. This includes £80 million for the Scottish National Investment Bank to offset changes in the value of the bank’s existing investments”.
Is that because we are writing things off?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
So it is a negative block grant adjustment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Okay. I will leave that one just now. I am not sure that I totally got on top of it, but that is fine.
On landfill tax—if I can find the right page. Again, I am a little bit unsure about this. The block grant adjustment has changed. Is that partly because the UK has been more successful at reducing landfill than we have? It is on page 16 of the guidance—paragraphs 77 and 78, I think.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
The UK Government is collecting more taxes, so we have been more successful in landfill than it has.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
John Mason
Does that put all the onus on the chair? What if the chair makes a decision with which others disagree that a case should be considered by three panel members?
A lot of the debate has previously centred on the view that three should be the norm, and that only relatively minor issues should be considered by a panel of one. In amendment 27, proposed new subsection 6B(2) of the 2011 act states:
“The selected chairing member must”,
and continues thereafter. What happens if the single chairing member makes an error, or whatever?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
John Mason
I hear what the minister is saying, and she is saying it very strongly, but I have also listened to what Ross Greer and other members have said. What about a child who has had bad experiences with lots of adults and assumes that an advocate will be just the same? That would be a challenging position for the advocate, but their aim would be to win the child round and put them in exactly the position that the minister describes, with the child feeling in charge and in control of the situation. If we do not have an opt-out model, the child would not have the opportunity even to try that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
John Mason
I totally agree with what the minister has just said but, to echo Martin Whitfield, I note that we could maybe put something about that into the bill at stage 3 in order to tighten it up. My fear is that it could be too convenient for a chair to say, “It’ll be easier for me to make a decision rather than having the hassle of getting other people involved.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Should we just say that sustainability of local government should be a priority for it, without going into any more specifics? Do you think that that is the way that we should—