The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3154 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
I do live in a flat, as it happens, most of the year.
Mr Drummond, the RIAS submission says that using a per square metre charge will involve quite a lot of “cost and complexity”. Would it be better to use a calculation that is based on value rather than square metres?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
You were asked about Lord Penrose’s statement, in which he said that every penny spent on the contaminated blood inquiry was a penny less for the NHS or front-line services. That might have been a bit insensitive, but would you agree that it was a true statement?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
Would the chair ask them unfair questions? Surely the chair should adapt the questions to what the participant can deal with.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
If we are raising a special tax, both here and in the rest of the UK, for cladding for residential buildings, there is an argument that a special case should be made to deal with cladding and RAAC outwith colleges’ normal capital expenditure. I am not expecting a commitment today but, when the minister and cabinet secretary are making arguments at the budget table, I hope that they can make the point that we have done something special for the residential sector and that we should consider doing something special for colleges and others.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
Related to that point, I am interested in a paragraph in the report about colleges that was published on Friday, which stated:
“Colleges are also actively reviewing their estates to identify disposals that could generate cash ... To this end, a number of colleges are actively reviewing whether one or more of their campuses require to be closed.”
Is that something that the Government would actively support, or is it something that we have to reluctantly accept? Are we expecting a wholesale reduction in the number of campuses across the board? I think that one is closing in Clackmannanshire.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
I would like there to be more money for colleges and I would raise tax to do that, but I accept that other committee colleagues want there to be more money but will not say where the money should come from.
11:30I will move on to capital, which Pam Duncan-Glancy has already touched on. Glasgow Kelvin College mentioned that it needs £8.2 million to tackle cladding. Colleges Scotland has said that there are 11 buildings that have RAAC, across seven colleges. At the Finance and Public Administration Committee meeting yesterday, the ministerial team confirmed that the building safety levy will be only for residential buildings. Colleges will not get anything from the building safety levy, which I find a bit disappointing. I think that the reason is that we have to follow the English model. Are we clear as to how much money will be needed to tackle RAAC and cladding in colleges and possibly universities?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
I take it from those responses that we do not have an overall figure. Glasgow Kelvin College was quite specific that it required £8.2 million. Like everyone else, it will be bargaining; it will want a bit more and will have to argue with everyone else. Leaving aside where the money might come from, are you saying that the SFC has not yet provided a figure on exactly what is needed to tackle cladding and RAAC?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
You say that some of that is confidential, but do you see a report from those reviews?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
The SFC says that it will more closely monitor governance going forwards. Is that something that the SFC has not been doing, or is it more the case that the institutions have not been doing it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
The committee has been looking at the Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill, which affects the SFC, your responsibilities and even your powers. My feeling is that, with regard to looking at the institutions, your position needs to be strengthened. Are you happy with what is in the bill, or do you think that you could do with more powers?