The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3154 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
Fair enough.
You said that all the different parties have to have lawyers. I wonder whether that is the case. Could we have a more inquisitorial approach and a less confrontational approach in public inquiries? I am also on the Education, Children and Young People Committee, which is looking into children’s hearings. There is a strong argument to be made that an inquisitorial approach should be taken in that system, with information being found out by asking the children and the families, rather than by the two parties having lawyers. Do you think that we could have public inquiries without having lawyers on both sides?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
I am sorry—can they not represent themselves?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
But we are considering changing the statutory requirements, so none of that is fixed.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
You say that participants should be properly heard, and I agree with that, but I get constituents who, if I let them, would speak to me for five hours on their housing needs, their medical needs or whatever. I just do not have that time, and I have to restrict the time that they have to speak to me. I get the main points, they get a bit longer to explain the situation and then I have to draw the discussion to a close. A general practitioner gives people eight or 10 minutes. Should there not be a bit more control, so that the participants and the lawyers do not get to speak for as long as they want to?
I am an accountant, and audits have to be done in a certain time. You do the best that you can in three months for a million pounds or whatever the cost to do that might be. Could we not go down that route?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
I hear what you are saying, and I realise that that is what is happening at the moment. We are trying to explore whether there is a better or different way of doing it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
It is good for us to hear a range of evidence. I accept that.
One of your suggestions is that the victims or people who are affected should be satisfied by the inquiry or should get closure, or however you want to describe it. You have been involved in four public inquiries. Have you found that all the victims have been satisfied by the procedures?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
Were all those in relation to the ICL Stockline inquiry satisfied?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
—although not in the same way as if we had been in the hospital. The trams cost about £500 million, so we all paid about £100 each for them, so we are victims. However, as a victim of the tram project, I do not feel particularly helped by the inquiry taking so long.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
I take your point that a major decision is made when a minister agrees to a public inquiry. It just seems that, once such a decision has been made, it is a bit of an open field. I know that you do not like the term “blank cheque”. However, I asked one of the previous witnesses, Lord Hardie, what he would do if we gave him £5 million for two years and asked him to give us the best result he could in that time. He said that he would not do it. Others have said that they would. Would you agree with him?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
For the trams, it might have been.