The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3658 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
John Mason
I just have one point on the Revenue Scotland and Tax Powers Act (Involved Third Party) Amendment Order. Could you give us an example of a scenario where this might have an impact? Who would an involved third party be and why would we want to—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
John Mason
:You are talking about entering the business premises of an involved third party. Why would anyone want to do that? Is it just to check?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
John Mason
:I am very sceptical about it. We have hospitals, colleges and schools and we cannot just abolish them and say that we will start from zero tomorrow.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
John Mason
:Oh, go on.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
John Mason
:I want to follow up with Tiffany Ritchie about the Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill. The bill will come at quite a cost and we will not lose any public bodies; at the end of the day, we will still have the SFC and Skills Development Scotland—their responsibilities are just moving. I take your point that the approach will be more joined up, but there will be a significant cost for pensions. As soon as the staff move, their pensions will have to be topped up, and I believe that there will be an information technology cost, because the SDS system has to be disentangled so that parts of it can be put into the SFC. I am happy to accept that what we end up with will be better than what we started with, but is it inevitable that there will be significant one-off costs that follow a bit of rearrangement? Others may want to comment on that.
Linked to that, I will pose a question to the police. The reform to your service is held up as one of the most significant recent reforms. If I am correct, we went from eight bodies to one, which I think is a good thing. Has that been a total success? Is it a good financial model that other parts of the public sector could copy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
John Mason
:Would you like to debate the subject?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
John Mason
:So, as well as checking on the quarry itself, Revenue Scotland will be able to check other organisations that take the material. Is that the idea?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
John Mason
Can you give us an idea of proportions? How many children from independent schools go to Scottish universities and how many go elsewhere?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
John Mason
One of the points that you make is that children might be doing GCSEs and then they have to move into the state sector. That raises the question, why are they doing GCSEs? Is it not a bit unwise to be using another country’s exam system in Scotland?
11:00
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
John Mason
The whole area of post-legislative scrutiny is interesting. Does Martin Whitfield agree that one of the challenges is timing because, if you do it too soon, there has not been enough time for the new legislation to settle in and take effect but, if you do it too late, it becomes pointless? Are the dates in his amendment the right ones to achieve that balance?