The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3675 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Maybe I can press you on that a little bit. For example, one of the big aims of the Covid inquiry here has been to allow victims, such as family members who lost somebody in a care home, to have the opportunity to speak and share their experience and all that kind of thing. Would that aspect be public in Sweden?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
I fear that that is where we are at the moment.
In answer to Liz Smith, you talked about building trust in institutions. You are a little bit more optimistic than I am. I am not sure whether that is even possible, because we have social media nowadays. I know that, in the past, newspapers and other things were always undermining institutions, but there was so much negative stuff, even to the extent that Covid did not exist and all that sort of thing. Is it possible to build up public trust or do we have to accept that trust is falling and, even if standards stay the same, there will be more demand for inquiries, blame, vengeance and all those things?
11:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Thanks. That is helpful.
Dr Prasser, is it the same in Australia? Is having a group of people rather than just one person the norm?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
I have a couple of other points, both of which relate to Sweden. As I understand it, if there are recommendations, there has to be a proposal as to how those will be funded. Is that the case?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
That raises the question of privacy as against everything being in public. I had had the impression from what we had read that inquiries in Sweden are largely in private, but I now think that that is not the case. They discuss certain things in private and have other evidence in public. Is there any argument for maybe doing more of an inquiry in private? Would people be more open in their evidence if it were in private?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Yes. I will finish on that note.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Thank you for all the evidence so far. It has been most interesting.
If I may start with yourself, Professor Dahlström, I was interested that there was general public acceptance of the Coronavirus Commission and its results—and it was incredibly quick. It started, as I understand it, in June 2020 and completed in February 2022, which was under two years, and cost very little money.
Sweden was very interesting and a lot of people here felt that we should be copying Sweden, instead of the people that we did copy. In one sense, what your country did was quite controversial and yet the inquiry happened very quickly. Was it too quick? Would there have been an advantage if it had either started a bit later or gone on a bit longer?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
The answer to your question whether we think that the present system is working is no. We are doing our inquiry because we think that the system is not working. We are certainly keen to learn from other jurisdictions and so on.
As a comment on what you said, we have certainly had evidence that in one or two inquiries in Scotland, the chair has lost the confidence of almost everyone. Then there is no balance and no comeback because the inquiry is entirely based on the one person. You probably know of the current inquiry from which the chair has resigned. We are still to see how that will be taken forward. It seems to me that a lot is based on the one person. However, I take your point about the cost if we start having a bigger panel and so on.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
That leads on to what I was thinking of asking you about. Is it a disadvantage that judges are used to court cases that can go on and on for ever? I should say that I am also an accountant. Lawyers, in my opinion, do not seem to operate within timescales. It will take them as long as it takes. We had the impression from the Australian witness that the royal commissions become like courtrooms. There are lawyers supporting the victims. There are lawyers supporting the police. There are lawyers everywhere. Is that a downside, that too many lawyers are involved?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
I am also thinking about who is chairing or whatever. Obviously, you need a person as a chair, but we have the impression that both Australia and Sweden often have a panel or a group or however they describe it, that would include experts or different people who are interested. We seem to be very focused on having one person. The problem with that is that, if the one person resigns, we are back to square one—I do not know where we go. That is happening. Have you views on that? Should the chairing of an inquiry be focused on one person?