The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3675 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
I found your paper interesting. I confess that I did not understand some of it, but it is good. I will press you on the issue. What is the prevalence of long Covid? At one point in your paper, the figure of 1.8 per cent is mentioned, which would be, perhaps, 90,000 people.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
You are quite keen on long Covid clinics, about which it would be fair to say that we have had mixed evidence. For example, we have heard that they are extremely costly per patient and that people with other conditions might be diverted away from GPs to long Covid clinics, so other illnesses could be missed. Are GPs key to all of this? In England, GPs refer people to long Covid clinics, so they are the key people.
10:30COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
Thanks for that. We could explore that further, but I have to stop as I have used up my time.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
The commonly used figure is about 170,000. Do you feel that that figure would be reasonable, if you are underestimating the prevalence?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
That is fair—that is what we want to hear.
I will come to Dr Scott, but first I have another question for Professor Robertson. I was interested to see that more of the long Covid seems to have come from the alpha and delta variants, with less of it coming from omicron. Is that what you found?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
But we are not facing a big problem that we are aware of at this stage.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
Okay—fair enough.
The last issue relates to the technical agreement on resource borrowing limits, which is mentioned in annex D. I understand that there has been further work with the UK Government on when we could and could not borrow. Some of that is quite technical. I understand that, within a particular tax, we net off—I see that the minister is smiling so, obviously, I am in a difficult area—the pluses and the minuses, but we do not net them off between tax and social security. Can you explain that a little?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
Right—so it is the actual sum rather than the amount of interest. I find that confusing. Most things are fixed—they are either in this year or next year, and there is no flexibility to move them around. I was a bit puzzled about why there is flexibility in that area.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
Just to clarify, I should say that, despite what the convener has said, I fully accept that a lot of this is technical, and I do not necessarily get very excited about it. When I see words and phrases such as “non-cash”, “estimates”, “economists”, “current macroeconomic climate” and “impairment”, I take it all with a little pinch of salt.
I do not have a lot of questions. However, I note that the UK budget is coming up next week, and it will be focused on 2023-24. Is there any risk to our current year from next week’s statement?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
But if there is a positive in one area, such as social security, and a negative in tax, it sounds as though it is to our advantage that they are not netted off against each other. Is there a logic to them not being netted off against each other?