The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
John Mason
No, that was helpful. If I am not mistaken, the section 86 that you refer to is in the 2008 act, which is now being amended in this bill.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
John Mason
You used the word “balance”, which is exactly the word that was in my mind. From what you know of the 2008 act, did it get the balance wrong? Was there not enough in it?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
John Mason
That is okay. Does Professor Hunter want to say anything on that point?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
John Mason
Thank you; that is very helpful.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
John Mason
If we do not address bankruptcy in the bill, how much longer might it be before the review carries on?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
John Mason
I have used up my time, but Mr Menzies wants to come back in.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
John Mason
I would like to stick with Mr Smith on the issue of scrutiny. I am still trying to get my head round what should be in primary legislation and what should be in secondary legislation. Would you argue that, generally, the scrutiny of primary legislation is easier and better than that of secondary legislation?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
John Mason
To push you on that final point, if some powers are specific for Ebola and some for TB, should we not leave them until the situation arises and have them in the secondary legislation?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
John Mason
I declare that I am a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
Professor McKenzie Skene mentioned earlier—I am not sure whether she is available to speak or not—that there is a working group and that a review of wider bankruptcy legislation is going on. Having been on finance and other committees in the past, I know that that is quite a complex area.
My main question is this: should the bill touch on bankruptcy or should we leave it for the review to come, in due course?
I am not hearing Professor McKenzie Skene—I am not sure that she is there.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
John Mason
There is a lot of material to consider in the evidence. I have noted down some comments that have been made by witnesses, but not always who made them. Some might be from you, but some might not. Some witnesses have commented that the whole review is too high level and that there is not enough detail in it. Do you agree? If so, what else should be in it? How much more detailed should it be?