The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2559 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
John Mason
Thank you very much.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
John Mason
Okay. Looking ahead to future vaccinations or boosters, we know that protection and immunity wane over time, so what is the present thinking about when people will need a fourth dose? Will that be before next winter or earlier than that?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
John Mason
Sticking with the vaccine theme, where are we on 5 to 11-year-olds? Has there been any change in the JCVI thinking or is the roll-out still just to the vulnerable ones?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
John Mason
Do we know whether the JCVI is looking at vaccinations for all 5 to 11-year-olds, or is that not on the table?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
John Mason
Before Christmas, when we heard about omicron, the message from South Africa seemed to be that it was transmitting faster but was less serious than previous variants. Various reasons were given for why we should not accept that that would be the case here—it was mentioned, for example, that South Africa had a different climate and that the population was younger. Looking back, should we have accepted the South African experience more readily?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
John Mason
My final question is one that I asked John Swinney when he was finance secretary, so I thought that I would ask you it, too. How many times has an Opposition MSP or party asked you to reduce current reactive spending in order to put more into preventative spending? Have you had many approaches from parties or individuals along those lines?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
John Mason
That was a nice, short answer. Are the Westminster folk open to moving down that route?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
John Mason
Thank you very much. That was helpful.
With regard to the uncertainty around the £620 million, which has been mentioned, I note that one of the elements is the personal allowance spillover. I realise that that has been going on for quite some time now, although I note from your response that you hope that the situation will be resolved this year. By “this year”, do you mean by March, which is only two months from now, or at some point during 2022? Given how long the situation has been going on, should we be a little bit pessimistic and assume that it will not be resolved soon?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
John Mason
I should point out that I live in my own constituency, so I am certainly not your constituent, convener.
We have covered a lot of areas. Liz Smith pointed out that there are certain parallels between the relationship that we have with Westminster and the relationship that local government has with us, so there are lessons that we can all learn from one another.
I am thinking about the year end and wondering whether we can learn lessons from local government. I understand that councils have reserves and, broadly, can even out their year-end balances better by using money that they have been able to keep in reserve. Some of that money is for a particular purpose and some of it is just kept for general purposes. Are there lessons that we can learn from that, which might improve the situation with regard to the reserves that we are allowed to keep in terms of our relationship with Westminster?
On the capital side, we have what I feel is quite an artificial limit of £3 billion, whereas local government has a prudential borrowing opportunity, which seems to work quite well.
In general, do you think that we could improve the fiscal framework by learning from those relationships?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
John Mason
I am sure that the committee is unanimous in wishing you well on that.
Another area that has already been touched on is that of what the impact on us will be of any announcement of spending at UK level. We accept that last year was exceptional, with huge Barnett consequentials, some of which were guaranteed during the year. I follow the logic that that cannot happen on an on-going basis, although we could probably argue about that. You will have a better understanding than I do of what people at Westminster think about that.
If new money is announced at Westminster for, say, a care service in England, for health or, indeed, for anything, should not those who make the announcement, at the time that they make it, have an idea of how much of that is new money and how much is being reallocated? I assume that when you make a spending announcement, you will have had to think about how much of the money has been reallocated from somewhere else—as you recently made clear with the extra support that was made available—and how much of it is new money from somewhere.
Could the Government at Westminster not do more to give an indication in that regard? As you have said, its position completely changed within the space of a few days. Could it be a bit more open in that respect, or does it just not have those figures?