The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3658 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
Is that on top of the analysis that we already have? It is not instead of anything that we have already.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
That is great. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
Is that a regular interaction, or was that a one-off?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
I am surprised that Michelle Thomson did not ask about this, but I was struck by the change in the male to female split of applicants that you have had. Your report says that 61.9 per cent of applicants did not identify as male, compared with 33 per cent the previous year. Did you do something that led to that change?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
I like the word “flexibility”, but other people might say that it equals risk. Last week, when Professor Heald was giving evidence to the committee, he made the point that, every time we take on a new power—broadly speaking, I want us to take on new powers—the risk increases, but there is no equivalent increase in our borrowing powers and so on to cover that risk. I accept that this particular case is tiny in the scheme of things, so I am not worried about it, but I wonder what your thinking is. As we take on aggregates tax, air passenger duty and so on, does the UK Government understand that? Are you putting the argument to the UK Government that the fiscal framework has to change?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
Even though it is one little thing, it seems to be part of a longer-term trend.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
John Mason
Cabinet secretary, you mentioned in your statement today the figure of a £70 million increase for colleges, and the convener has repeated that. Can you explain where that £70 million comes from?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
John Mason
It was not at all clear. Actually, it was impossible to work out—SPICe and I looked at the original figures and they just were not there.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
John Mason
One example from a few years ago is the family nurse partnership programme. That is perhaps more of a health thing, but if a kid gets a good start in life, it will affect them when they come to primary school, secondary school and so on.
Is it impossible or is it easy to split what is preventative spend from what is reactive spend? At primary school, to some extent, you are reacting to what has already happened to the kid before they got to school, but you are also preparing them for secondary school and beyond.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
John Mason
There was no way that anyone could work out that £70 million figure until SPICe asked the Government to give an explanation.
I am not querying your figures. However, we used to think that there were two categories: resource spending and capital spending. Now, we have three categories: core capital, special capital and resource.
I accept that the Dunfermline learning campus was unusual—at £30-odd million, that is a big spend in the education budget. However, in terms of overall Government spend—it is spending £200 million on A9 for example—£30 million is not that big. On the £70 million figure, we are comparing the core capital and the resource against the core capital and the resource, and we are ignoring the Dunfermline campus.