The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2594 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
That is fair enough. I was just wondering about the financial side of things, because that is my background. Every part of this seems to work differently, but your response has been helpful and clarifies things a bit.
Professor Peacock, your report in particular was very glowing about how things went, and COG-UK seems to have been a total success. There is, in fact, nothing negative in the report at all. I think that RAND Europe did an overview, too, and everything that it said was also positive. Surely something went wrong. Could some things have been done better? For example, did people not join up as quickly as they should have done? Is there anything that did not go right?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
And is that for Scotland?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
Is that per year?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
Okay, thanks.
My final point concerns a question that I put to the earlier panel, which was about the desire to have a chief scientist for public health. Does any of you have an opinion on that?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
I am tempted to get into a debate on some of that. As you will probably know, in the political field everyone wants the money to go into accident and emergency, to deal with the actual issues.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
That sounds very positive. Does Professor Gunson want to come in?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
Seeing as you are there, I will ask you this. I do not totally understand some of the technical stuff that we were given. For example, a Scottish Government report on modelling the spread of Covid-19 says that, in November,
“wastewater Covid-19 levels were in the range of 21 to 32 million gene copies per person per day.”
Can you or one of your colleagues explain even roughly what that means?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
The conversation has been really interesting. I have to say that I am not an expert on sewage or related matters.
I will start with a question for George Ponton. What waste water surveillance was going on before Covid, particularly on diseases? What were you actually looking for, and how much water surveillance was happening?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
Dr Helliwell, were other countries doing that? Did the idea of testing the water start with Covid?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
John Mason
That is an interesting point. Where I live, people are now trying to separate rainwater from sewage. Is that important? Would that be helpful?