The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2601 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
Thanks very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
I share some of your concerns. The committee could perhaps look at the overall picture at some point.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
Is pay one of those factors? There are various figures in the papers. For example, 6.7 per cent was mentioned, but I think that that is an overall figure. The cleaning budget is up by only 3.9 per cent; I presume that the cleaners will be given a bit more than 3.9 per cent. You might be negotiating; I do not know, so I do not know what you can say in public, but can you give us any indication of the pay increases for next year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
I accept that. I do not know whether you can tell us anything privately or send us any private information about that, or whether you can at least keep us updated as things move forward. I assume that there will be a major impact on the budget and on your contingency funds if you have to settle for slightly more—or even slightly less—than you expect.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
That is helpful. Thank you.
If I understand it correctly, I think that you assumed that the uptake by MSPs of the staff allowance was 95 per cent, but you now assume that it was 93 per cent. Can you give a wee bit of explanation of that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
I accept that—some people will go to 100 per cent, I take it.
On saving money, can you give us an idea of practical things that we might be doing? For example, are we cutting the temperature in this building?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
I gather that the only plans for a new tax or a replacement tax relate to the aggregates levy, which is due to be devolved at some point. Is that the only new tax that is being looked at? What about a revamp of or a replacement for council tax—what is the timescale for that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
Which Prime Minister?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
As I understand it, you are looking for a 4.8 per cent cash increase this year. Some parts of the public sector have been given a flat-cash settlement. If the Parliament was to offer you a flat-cash settlement, what would that mean in practice?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
John Mason
I understand that and I am not really arguing with it, but other parts of the public sector are under the same pressures. We have discussed commissioners at some length. For clarity, who should take an overview of commissioners? Is it this committee? I accept your point that it is not the corporate body’s responsibility to say no, and I am sure that all the individual commissioners are doing and will do good work, but somebody needs to look at the overall picture and say that the money is not going into front-line services but into commissioners. Who should take that overall view?