The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3697 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
I take that point from the NHS point of view, but in some cases the family or the person is paying the care home fees. That can be around £6,000 a month, or £72,000 a year. An early death could be to the family’s financial advantage, and, sadly, we have known throughout history that some families want their relatives to end their lives more quickly in order to get their hands on the estate. If a person’s estate is going down by £72,000 a year, that is a big incentive for some families to encourage an early death, is it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
I accept that there are some safeguards in the bill. The concern is that, in legislation in this country and in other jurisdictions, often the initial jump has certain safeguards, and then things get watered down or widened out over time. I accept that you cannot be responsible for that, but the big jump is allowing this at all, and none of us can anticipate whether it will stick firmly going forward or whether it will gradually change. We have to take some of those things into account at this point, as we look ahead.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
I want to pick up on something that Andy Witty said—the issue might also affect others. Obviously, the colleges sector would like more money, and I wonder whether you think that the Scottish budget is spread out in a reasonable way, or whether we should be giving more money to colleges and universities, which would mean less money for other sectors. Over the years, we have been generous to health, which has received a real-terms increase every year, and social security spending is going up quite a lot due to things such as the Scottish child payment, which has been very successful. Have we got the balance wrong between investing directly in the economy, via the universities and colleges, and investing in health and social security?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
I will continue on that theme with two questions, and I go back to Andy Witty first.
You suggest that we have more money for colleges, as there is money coming through in the consequentials. The simple answer is that the money is going to social security. There has been a huge increase in that area last year and this year. Would you go as far as saying that we should cut back on social security, which would hurt some of the poorest people, in order to put more into colleges or other sectors? I aim that question at you to start with, but others might want to come in.
On a slightly similar theme, Mr Begbie, you said that we have a lot of people in low-paid jobs. Presumably, that includes cleaners and people who work in Tesco. If they all go into the tech sector, we will still need cleaners. Should we just be upping the minimum wage so that people in basic jobs are paid much better? Is that what you are arguing for?
10:45Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
What about Canada and the Netherlands?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
Thank you. Convener, we can discuss that later, but I am concerned that there is nothing in the FM about savings.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
John Mason
I follow your argument, but do you accept that, as long as the bill says that there should be targets, it does not need to say exactly what those targets are?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
John Mason
I take your point that we could proceed in either way. However, I would say that amendments 61 and 75, in particular, seem to be fairly gentle. Can you spell out your reservations a little bit more? All that they are saying is that we must “consider” whether certain information should be provided in Gaelic, and must
“have regard to the desirability”
of publishing certain other information in Scots. I am not sure that that means anything. What is the real problem with the amendments?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
John Mason
We are all dependent on the UK Government. Do you not have a clear timeline for all of that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
John Mason
You pointed out that it is positive that we now have a public sector pay policy, but there are some caveats. You and the Scottish Government are assuming that there will be a pay envelope of 9 per cent over three years, or a 3 per cent pay uplift for one year. It has been mentioned that 4.5 per cent would be the average pay growth, which is not in the forecast figures. Can we infer that the assumption is that there will be a reduction in staffing?