The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3697 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
I want to pick up on something that Andy Witty said—the issue might also affect others. Obviously, the colleges sector would like more money, and I wonder whether you think that the Scottish budget is spread out in a reasonable way, or whether we should be giving more money to colleges and universities, which would mean less money for other sectors. Over the years, we have been generous to health, which has received a real-terms increase every year, and social security spending is going up quite a lot due to things such as the Scottish child payment, which has been very successful. Have we got the balance wrong between investing directly in the economy, via the universities and colleges, and investing in health and social security?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
What about Canada and the Netherlands?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
Thank you. Convener, we can discuss that later, but I am concerned that there is nothing in the FM about savings.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
Over a year.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
Yes, it is difficult, but we have had a similar problem in this committee with a range of bills. I take your point that, normally, the committee is looking at costs perhaps being underestimated and savings perhaps being overestimated, and I am looking at it the other way round. However, we expect to see best estimates in the financial memorandum.
Presumably, there is evidence from around the world. It cannot be proved when someone would have died otherwise, but there must be estimates as to how much before the expected point of death they have died. It seems to me that there would be savings, and that is one of my concerns.
Although I take your point that doctors will not be making decisions or recommendations or giving advice based on financial factors, it is part of the system that we are all in a very cost-driven society. The state pension would be one cost, but if somebody was in hospital, I think that there would be a cost of perhaps £300 a day for being in hospital, so, for a week, we would be talking about a cost of £2,000. Similarly, in a care home, we would be talking about a cost of £6,000 a month, so it would not take very long for some kind of savings to start building up, surely.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
John Mason
Is it a legal requirement in Australia that people pay more wages?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
John Mason
I follow your argument, but do you accept that, as long as the bill says that there should be targets, it does not need to say exactly what those targets are?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
John Mason
I take your point that we could proceed in either way. However, I would say that amendments 61 and 75, in particular, seem to be fairly gentle. Can you spell out your reservations a little bit more? All that they are saying is that we must “consider” whether certain information should be provided in Gaelic, and must
“have regard to the desirability”
of publishing certain other information in Scots. I am not sure that that means anything. What is the real problem with the amendments?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
John Mason
We are all dependent on the UK Government. Do you not have a clear timeline for all of that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
John Mason
You pointed out that it is positive that we now have a public sector pay policy, but there are some caveats. You and the Scottish Government are assuming that there will be a pay envelope of 9 per cent over three years, or a 3 per cent pay uplift for one year. It has been mentioned that 4.5 per cent would be the average pay growth, which is not in the forecast figures. Can we infer that the assumption is that there will be a reduction in staffing?