The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3697 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
I turn to public sector reform. In paragraph 105 you say that public sector reform requires “significant investment”. There is the example of Registers of Scotland, which will be coming up, among others, in the next evidence session. Registers of Scotland seems to have managed to reform, digitise, do a lot of that kind of stuff and save on 10 per cent of its jobs—all without extra investment. It has just done that as part of its routine working. Is that possible on a bigger scale?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
I did not ask any questions about the instrument, because I really think that the measure is self-evidently a good thing. It will, I hope, raise revenue and help first-time buyers. It just seems absolutely the right thing to do.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
As I understand it, someone in Ayrshire who may need a particular procedure that cannot be done locally would go to Glasgow. In a sense, that system is working at the moment, so there may not be a lot of space for reform. You have mentioned AI. I understood from your submission and other papers that there is a bit of a barrier to some things because different health boards are doing things differently.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
I realise that every organisation is different, and maybe Chris Kerr can explain how Registers of Scotland can manage that cut without needing any extra input. By contrast, Food Standards Scotland says in its submission that it just wants more money and more people. Could we just cut funding by 10 per cent for everybody? Would that work, Chris?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
What would that mean? What is it that the Government does not understand? It has flexed the budget successfully during the year in the past two years. One scenario would be that, if it was you and me personally, we would try to save money so that, if we have a bad year, we would have some savings. However, the Government effectively cannot do that, because we have a limit on how much we can save, and because there is huge political pressure against saving money, when all the parties want us to spend every single penny. I am struggling to understand what the Government is missing, what it is not doing that it should be doing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
I do not want to keep pursuing this for ever. When the Government sets out the budget, should it also say how, if we were to get an extra billion pounds during the year from Westminster or for some other reason, we would spend that extra billion pounds or, if funds from Westminster or our tax revenues were to fall by a billion pounds, how we would save a billion pounds? Do you want it to be so specific that, at the beginning of the year, we say, “This is the budget that we’re hoping for, but this is what we would do if we didn’t manage it”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
Yet, almost counter to that, if the Government does not make longer-term commitments, in a sense, it would have more flexibility. The two kind of go together. If it gave just one-year grants to the third sector, it would have total flexibility to stop those grants the next year, and yet the third sector is always demanding, or asking for, a longer-term plan. If we get a longer-term plan from Westminster, that would obviously help, and then we could have a longer-term plan that would help local government and the third sector following on from that.
Whenever we make longer-term commitments, such as on social security, that reduces our ability to be flexible, does it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
I will go back to Mary Morgan and to some of the stuff that we have touched on about what is done nationally and what is done locally. One of the biggest public sector reforms in recent years has been the changes to the police and the fire service, which went from having eight local boards to one national board.
I do not expect you to answer all the questions, but how would that work with regard to the health service? Would it come from the health boards saying, “We want to join up with each other,” or does it need to come from the top, with the Government, saying, “We are going to put you all together”? Is there space for doing a bit more nationally or a bit less nationally?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
Regarding the point about head count, when I read the reports I was struck by the fact that Registers of Scotland has cut its workforce by 10 per cent. Chris Kerr can maybe comment on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
John Mason
Good morning. On the topic of people being convinced about residentials being a good thing, I am totally convinced that they are, so you do not need to persuade me about that. Further, our recent visit to meet teachers—arranged through the Educational Institute of Scotland—and the visit that we went on this Monday were both absolutely excellent.
Ms Smith, as we are both on the Finance and Constitution Committee and have previously discussed the financial aspects of the bill, you will not be surprised to hear that my questions are on finance.
You pointed out that the current system is not working, but is the problem really finance?