Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 29 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2881 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 23 January 2024

John Mason

Okay. Thanks.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 23 January 2024

John Mason

The convener touched on various areas, and I want to explore the integration authorities a little more.

This might be my ignorance, but a lot of terms are floating around. We used to talk about integration joint boards; in Glasgow, we talk about the health and social care partnership; and now we are talking about an integration authority. Are those just three different names for the same thing?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 23 January 2024

John Mason

Okay—that is helpful. I will probably explore that on my own at some future point.

Some of the points that have been made refer back to the way in which funding has worked for integration joint boards or integration authorities. Sometimes, it seems that the council and the health board have put in funding and then almost taken it back. There is a suggestion—if I can find the wording—that it is an almost circular process. At one point, the business case document says:

“funds were ceded to IAs and then largely given back to the hosts”.

At another point, it says:

“In practice much of the funding appears to be ‘circular,’ with funding allocated to the IJB from the local authority and health board, which then directs it back to the local authorities and health boards (and Health and Social Care Partnerships)”.

Will the new system work better? Will there be better integration? On the one hand, integration is a good thing, but it can also make it difficult for councils and health boards to follow the pound.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 23 January 2024

John Mason

I was thinking of practical issues. It is a slightly different topic, but we had an issue in Glasgow with link workers, who are linked to general practices. The local general practitioner opinion—that is, the NHS—said that link workers were good and that we needed to fund them, but the HSCP said that it could not fund them and the Government came in with more money. Would that kind of decision making change in future?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 23 January 2024

John Mason

In the programme business case, you contrast what would happen if we carried on as usual with what could happen if we had the new system. It says that a new system could enable various things, such as

“strategic integration, national oversight, accountability and opportunities to invest in preventative care rather than crisis responses,”

and the possibility of avoiding

“expenditure on poor outcomes such as those that are experienced by people who are delayed in hospital”.

The business case goes on to say:

“there could be considerable costs that are avoidable if the current system can be improved”.

Can you go into that a little bit more? Are we saying that passing the bill and having the national care service will automatically produce savings that we can put into preventative care? The committee has been looking at that issue for quite a long time now. Alternatively, is it just that there is a possibility of savings?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 23 January 2024

John Mason

Surely, information sharing cannot in itself lead to big savings, can it?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Replacing European Union Structural Funds

Meeting date: 18 January 2024

John Mason

You have mentioned the long-term plan for towns, and the seven towns that were chosen, a number of times. Can you say a little more about how the seven towns were chosen?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Replacing European Union Structural Funds

Meeting date: 18 January 2024

John Mason

When will we be able to make a judgment as to whether the UK, and some of those communities, have been levelled up?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Replacing European Union Structural Funds

Meeting date: 18 January 2024

John Mason

It all seems very complex. Clearly you, the councils and the Scottish Government all have staff doing quite a lot of work on this, with you analysing the figures, councils putting in bids in the competitive process and so on. In retrospect, do you think that having so many funds with so many factors has been the best way of allocating the money? You could have just said, “Well, based on SIMD or whatever, we will top up the housing budget across the UK”, and that would have been pretty welcome in most council areas and would have saved all the analysis and the applications. Would that not have been better?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Replacing European Union Structural Funds

Meeting date: 18 January 2024

John Mason

Mr Gove, the term “levelling up” suggests to me that areas that or people who are poorer or further down the scale—or however they are described—should be pulled up nearer the areas or people at the top. That is a real emphasis on need. However, from some of the answers that you have given to Ms Smith and others, there seems to be the idea of a geographic spread of the money that goes out. I wonder whether those two things are compatible. Some people would have expected all the money to go to really needy areas and no money to go to Aberdeenshire, despite the fact that Aberdeenshire might have some pockets of deprivation. How do you square those things?