The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3154 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
Can we say the same about restraint? Should there always be one teacher who can do that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
I am sure that we would all agree with de-escalation, which has been mentioned a few times. However, in the geography department of a large school, when one child starts beating up another child who is autistic, what does the teacher do if they have not had that type of specific training? Do they intervene or do they phone the physical education department to send somebody over?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
We could pursue that aspect further, but I think that that is enough.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
We heard about an example earlier in which one teacher intervened and another did not, and both ended up facing a challenge.
I will ask my final question, because we are running out of time. You mention in virtually every line of your report that we need more resources and that that is the real answer, but you also express pessimism that there is not going to be much more resource and that you will simply get your 1 per cent of whatever it might be. Would you accept that we have to do something within the existing resources and that we cannot just sit back and wait until we have enough resources?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
Mr Britton, you seem to suggest—if I read your submission correctly; maybe I have got that mixed up with the view of the NASUWT witness, who has gone—that it should, in a sense, be up to the staff to choose what training they get, rather than making it mandatory. Am I misunderstanding or is that your line?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
What about work on air departure tax?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
Might it be five years, or 10 years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
One part of the report says:
“The Scottish Government remains committed to fulfilling Smith recommendations”,
which includes VAT,
“but must also protect the Scottish budget from unnecessary levels of risk.”
That is fine, but I thought that you might have said, “We are forgetting VAT—we have agreed with the UK Government that that is not happening.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
It is helpful to get that clarification.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
Public sector reform has already been mentioned, and I think that the assumption of us all is that it will reduce the workforce, costs and so on.
Last week, we debated the Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. It moves things around, mainly from Skills Development Scotland to the Scottish Funding Council, and the financial memorandum says that it is going to cost £33 million. I was encouraged to find, last week, that that figure had come down to £22 million, but it still seems like a lot of money to rearrange the furniture and, indeed, seems to be going in the opposite direction of what we thought was going to happen, which was to reduce the number of public bodies, the workforce and so on.
How do those things tie together? Is the bill a bit of an outlier, or is it a sign of things to come?