The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3334 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
It is sometimes said that people go to university and end up with degrees that do not get them applicable jobs. Is the member looking at that issue, too, in his amendment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
Will the member give way?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
Mr Briggs says that his amendment is similar to Pam Duncan-Glancy’s, but he is talking about a—that is, one—trade union representative, which I assume would cover universities, colleges and apprenticeships. Does he not agree that there would need to be a representative for each of those sectors, because they are quite different from each other? Even the unions representing college staff tend to be different unions from those representing university staff, and I think that there have been quite large differences between them in the past. How would Mr Briggs respond to that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
Is it not a fundamental principle of devolution that when we get money from Westminster, we can use it as we see fit? There would be no point in devolution if we just copied exactly what England did all the time.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
Is it not the case that the Government has been quite clear that child poverty and the health service are two high priorities? That is where we have prioritised the money, and therefore, inevitably, everything else has to slide down slightly.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
We are on the same ground on which I interacted with Pam Duncan-Glancy earlier. Does the member accept that we receive money from London that is not ring fenced, and that, for example, we do not have student fees here, so we need money to go into that sector? The Scottish Parliament chooses to do that, and his party, if it was ever in Government, might want to do it differently. The Scottish Government’s spending is absolutely transparent. It is audited and clear, and we can get information on what is spent. I suggest that there is no lack of transparency.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
I disagree with the use of the term “diverted”. Money coming from Westminster is not for a particular purpose. If, for example, we spend more on the health service, do not charge student fees or put more into the environment, that is not diverting money—it is just us making a different choice.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
In one sense, there is an argument for each of the proposals that the member has put forward, but am I right in saying that she is looking for at least six additional designated places—that is, a union rep for universities, colleges and apprentices and a student rep for universities, colleges and apprentices? Given that the board comprises between 11 and 14 people, would we not be getting things a little bit out of balance?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
I agree that those who teach and work in the sector and those who study are incredibly important and, indeed, are the reason for our having colleges, universities and apprenticeships, but does the member not think that we must involve a fair number of people who are real experts in the field, who have studied or worked in it for years, or who are academics? Surely that group of people is pretty important, too.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
John Mason
Amendment 94 refers to
“a publicly-funded Scottish apprenticeship”.
Does that mean in the public sector? Would it mean that local authorities would have to provide any number of apprenticeships?