The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1023 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graeme Dey
Does anyone else want to come in on that? If not, I will move on.
Some of the written evidence in response to the Parliament’s call for views suggests that the impact of the pre-action protocol is going to be quite limited, because there is no duty on the landlord to comply with it. Is it not the case that landlords would be ill advised not to comply with the protocol, because of the consideration that will be given to their participation in it when it comes to any process that follows?
I see lots of nodding heads, so I will not pursue the point. Can I—
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graeme Dey
I apologise, convener.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graeme Dey
Finally, we keep talking about this issue in relation to landlord participation. After everything that I have read on this, I am still a little bit unclear whether there is any expectation of tenant participation in the process. We are told that a landlord’s failure to engage in it will be a consideration for the tribunal. Are we of the view that it would be a consideration against the tenant if they failed to engage? Does anyone have a view on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graeme Dey
This question is probably best directed to John Blackwood to start with. What evidence, if any, is there of the effect of the temporary introduction of the pre-action protocol? Has it led to a reduction in rent arrears or prevented applications for evictions being made to the tribunal?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graeme Dey
I seek some clarity on a point that I raised with the previous panel. The matter is not clear in anything that I have read. When sitting and making a judgment in a case, is the tribunal’s discretion sufficient when, say, a landlord has fully followed, or has sought fully to follow, the pre-action protocol, but the tenant has ignored all approaches, and there were no reasonable grounds for that? I am not talking about the sorts of circumstances that you touched on. Would the tribunal have discretion to take into account the fact that the tenant had not engaged with attempts to find a resolution?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graeme Dey
You are right to say that John Blackwood of the Scottish Association of Landlords was quite positive about the protocol. However, he suggested that the SAL would be keen to have dialogue on refinement of the protocol, on some of the detail and on how it is presented. Would you be open to that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graeme Dey
With regard to your point about people being unsure, perhaps the very existence of the protocol focuses minds.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graeme Dey
With regard to resolving neighbourhood disputes and providing adequate tenancy support where it is needed, is the current reporting mechanism—the self-assessment, if you like—robust enough to ensure that what is being recorded is accurate?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graeme Dey
How would you respond, minister, to the concerns of Living Rent that the current process of self-assessment against the charter’s indicators is not suited to delivering the charter’s outcomes and that a more robust and accountable regulatory approach might be needed?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graeme Dey
I want to explore how some of the legislation is being implemented both in practice and in spirit. The social housing charter refers to standards and outcomes that homeless people can expect from landlords with regard to access to help and advice, quality of accommodation and continuing support to help those people to access and keep a home. At the risk of being parochial, I want to highlight a case in my constituency. Individuals who were given notice by private landlords approached the local authority, as the go-to for finding accommodation, only to be told to sit tight for the notice period, after which the eviction process would be started. The council appeared reluctant to take away some of the burden and stress being felt by those individuals at that early stage by offering advice or, indeed, engaging with the private sector landlord. Where does such an approach fit—if it fits at all—in the charter? Even if it is okay, is it in the spirit of how the charter should be applied?