The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 983 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
Yes—if there is a significant issue to be dealt with and if it does not create practical issues.
There is perhaps a lack of knowledge of the processes that organisations have to follow, particularly with a complex request, to ascertain which part of the organisation might hold the information and can pull it together. I can understand the issue if someone who has requested information is contacted on day 17 and asked whether they can give further clarification. Perhaps they have started from a standpoint of great concern, so they will treat that request with suspicion. We are saying that there are often practical and understandable reasons why that has occurred.
We are not aware, anecdotally or through the network of contacts, that there is a significant issue. We just have to ensure that, if such a change is to be made, there will be no unintended consequences that might lead to poorer quality answers being provided simply to avoid falling foul of the process.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
On section 2(1), we would always consider recommendations made by the commission on the extension of FOISA, and we can demonstrate that that is the case.
We have reservations about the extension of the Parliament’s powers, which part of your question was about, and we went into some detail on those reservations in our memorandum to the committee. I can summarise them, if you like, but they are well covered there. For the reasons that we have outlined, we are not convinced that that is the appropriate way to go. It is worth noting that Parliament already has a substantial input in that designating is dealt with under the affirmative process, which means that there is a balance between the role of ministers and Government and the role of Parliament. I think that that strikes the right balance.
10:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
We do not believe they are appropriate. We think that the current system strikes the right balance.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
That goes to your point about resource, which is the word that you used, convener. We have the breadth of expertise and input into the process that the Parliament is currently unable to provide.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
The engagement that there is in the lead-up to the completion of the FOISA designation provides the groundwork to ensure that the result will be successful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
If we are talking about a requirement to consider, the Government would be relaxed about that, but a requirement to be directed would be another matter.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
We have concerns based on legislative competence in relation to the Lord Advocate and the procurators fiscal. I will bring in Ross Grimley to expand on that a little.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
Jill McPherson knows all about codes of conduct.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
It does, and I said so in the memorandum that I sent to the committee, but I can understand why people from the outside would feel otherwise. However, since the last additional roll-out, which I led, we had the pandemic, which had an enormous effect on the activity of the Government and the Parliament, and we took a view that the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill should be in place before we conduct the consultation on this issue.
I defend that decision, but I can understand why people have looked at that situation and felt that it was frustrating that more had not been done or that things were not done more quickly.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
I will bring in Jill McPherson on that.