The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1652 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
We have heard about the on-going legal arguments about whether new cryptocurrency is created with each transfer. Again, that relates to the complexity in this area that has been raised by some technologists.
You might want to bring in your team to speak about this, but I think that my very complicated question can probably be answered simply by saying that we are bringing all of this into property law.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
It will not surprise anyone to hear that, like the vast bulk of the public, I have not read any of the textbooks on Scots corporeal moveables.
I will be honest with you. During the morning, I have had a discussion on WhatsApp with some anoraks about the use of some of the buzzwords—I do not think that we can call them buzzwords; I will call them technical terms—that we have used today, including “rivalrousness” and “immutables”. None of that really matters to the folk out there, because the exercise that we are carrying out is simply to put digital assets into property law and to put protections in for people through our court system. It is that simple, is it not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. I have some questions about acquisition and transfer. First, however, I want to clarify something. In some regards, folk watching the evidence sessions will be baffled by some of what is being said—that is the reality—but the simple fact is that the bill is designed only to ensure that digital assets are included in Scots property law. It is that simple, is it not, minister?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
We are having a discussion about what should be a simple bill, and I recognise that the tangents that we have gone off on concern issues that will inevitably crop up in day-to-day life as we move forward.
Gordon MacDonald raised the idea of having a panel of experts to provide guidance. A lot of witnesses have mentioned that and have talked about how it could be used. However, it occurs to me that the issue of how digital assets impinge on other policy areas or legislation is too large to be addressed simply by an expert panel and that what is required is a holistic Government approach. Let us take the carbon credits aspect. Last week, Professor Robbie was a bit exercised by the fact that the carbon credits aspect had been deemed to be out of scope of the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill. The Government will have to pay more attention to that as we move forward, will it not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Would anyone on your team like to comment on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Again, a lot of questions have arisen from our evidence sessions, but they are not necessarily matters for the bill, which is a simple bill.
I will now move on to the confusing bits about transfers and corporeal moveables. The bill will treat digital assets as corporeal moveables for the purpose of acquisition and transfer, and that will create a body of case law to support decisions in the area. Some respondents to our call for views have highlighted risks, including in relation to involuntary transfer and on-going legal arguments about whether new cryptocurrency is created with each transfer. What work have the Scottish Government and your team done to scope out the impact of treating digital assets as corporeal moveables in that way?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Quite recently, there has been an explosion in folk buying land, with some becoming large landowners very quickly. In your opinion, has that expansion, a large amount of which has probably been down to carbon unit pricing and so on, had a negative effect on smaller tenants, farmers and landowners?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
It has been trying to do so basically since the Parliament was created.
I am interested in your thoughts on whether carbon units should be property.