The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1261 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
You say that it is a local authority issue, but I think that it is an everybody issue. It may well be that the local authority roads folk are in charge, but I have often found from bitter experience, both as a councillor and since I have been in Parliament, that the lack of co-operation leads to nonsenses whereby the local authority resurfaces a road or pavement and it is dug up five minutes later because a utility has not responded or has come back later saying, “We’ve got vital work to do here”. That is a waste of money and also a waste of time for folk, given the road or pavement closures. How do we get better at that, rather than just saying, “Ach, that’s for the local authority to deal with”? How can you save money from all of that, Mr Farrer?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
Being entirely non-parochial, I am glad to hear that you are in touch with the planners in the city, but the same goes for elsewhere. I know, Mr Farrer, that you are very well aware of the difficulties that there were at Staney Hill in Shetland, which I think have now been resolved. However, those co-operations need to be with much more than just city planners. Do you agree?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
Okay. You have picked the wrong cities, but—[Laughter.]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
Hopefully, that will come.
I want to move on to ask about new development, planning gain and Scottish Water’s input—or lack of it, sometimes—into planning applications. I was pleased when, previously, you realigned your teams on the ground in the interests of development, particularly with regard to the Government’s affordable housing programme, but what can you do better in order to be in at the very start of the process and say what is and is not possible when it comes to very big development applications?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
Okay. When something is dug up and a patch goes on where you have put in new piping, repaired piping or whatever, the reinstatement is sometimes not the best. It can lead to potholes very quickly, which is a problem throughout the country at the moment. How do you get better at that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
Getting that right would ensure that you get more bang for your buck from that £1.1 billion of capital investment, would it not?
10:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
Let me expand on the issue of alignment, which is important and gets more bangs for the buck. Aberdeen City Council has embarked on a project to improve Union Street. You and I know that a lot of the work that you will have to do will be around Market Street down to the harbour and beyond. Have you and Aberdeen City Council given any thought to contracting works together, which would benefit all and probably save all of you a bit of money?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you very much, convener. You have touched upon the £1.1 billion of capital spend. Mr Plant, you said that you look at best value and not just cost. I want to explore that further, because money is tight and sometimes a wee bit of illogicality and a lack of common sense come into play when we are dealing with capital projects.
First, I want to explore the level of co-operation and co-ordination with other utilities and local authorities in order that Scottish Water work can be done at the same time as other utility work is being done, or before road or pavement resurfacing, which might save you some money. I do not know who is best placed to answer that. I would imagine that it is Mr Farrer.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Can I stop you there, Mr Mitchell? You immediately went on to speak about a survey about employers. My interest is in apprentices—the folk who are currently in apprenticeships, who often feel that they are not listened to. As I said, their number 1 point is about how little they are paid, but the second point is always that they are not listened to. You just jumped straight into giving answers about an employer survey.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
How do we change that culture and get to the point at which we listen to the learners and apprentices, rather than listen to somebody who quite possibly has never been in the front line of the business that they are carrying out or, if they have been, they have not done so for a long time? How do we put the learner first? How do we make courses relevant?