Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 10 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1523 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

Good morning. My questions are for Scottish Enterprise in the main.

Mr Gillespie, you have mentioned the three missions in your new strategy. In light of the budget impacts that you have talked about, particularly from the cuts to financial transactions, I am interested in hearing about what you will not be doing in the future that you would want to do, as a result of that hit, particularly to FT funding. Have you looked at the economic impact of all of that?

Moreover, as far as the strategy is concerned, I sometimes hear critical voices both in my constituency and beyond that your concentration is far too much on inward investment instead of growing our own. What would you say to those critics?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

Maybe you have to deal with those media commentaries, but I also think that you need to do more in letting folk know what you are up to.

You said that you would not invest so much in incremental growth in the future. However, what if that growth includes innovation? How will you invest in innovation in companies that already exist in Scotland?

Beyond the company aspect, there has been a lot of talk this morning about co-operation. What is your co-operation with the research sector in our universities, so that the knowledge and innovation that we come up with here leads to manufacturing and jobs here?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

You will publish a report on how you think you have done. How do you gather information from folks out there on how they think you have done?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

In answer to colleagues, you highlighted the impact of the 62 per cent cut to the financial transactions budget. Obviously, we have a budget coming up on 30 October. If the Treasury does not reinstate those financial transactions moneys that were previously available to the Scottish Government and Scottish Enterprise, what will the impact be on your ability to deliver your strategy?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

Would it be fair to say that, if financial transactions budgets do not change and do not increase again, and if capital investment from the Treasury does not increase, that would make all of your jobs much more difficult and it would be much more difficult to grow the Scottish economy sustainably?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

It would also be much more difficult to lever in private investment if we do not have that kick-start money from the UK Treasury.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Social Security (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

Not in real terms.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Social Security (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

I recognise that the amendment was lodged before the UK Government’s decision to slash winter fuel payments. In itself, amendment 5 means an extension to the social security system, which I am not against.

Mr Balfour talked about mitigation. Again, I am not agin mitigation; we have mitigated a lot of cuts in the Parliament previously. However, it annoys me when advocates for the union, such as Mr Balfour, come here with the expectation that the Scottish Government should be able to extend, expand and mitigate when the resources are not coming from the UK Treasury. Let us face facts. The cabinet secretary is going to have to deal with some of these issues, knowing fine that £160 million that she expected has now been pulled by the UK Treasury.

I get the points that Mr O’Kane and Ms Clark have made about further exploration of all this; it needs to be done. We also need to be blunt with the UK Treasury about the scenario that we now face.

Ms Clark talked about consequentials. I believe that we should always interrogate consequentials to see what can be done with them. In this case, however, we are facing negative consequentials, with £160 million being pulled out of the Scottish Government’s budget with a snap of the fingers. That is not good enough.

10:15  

I think that committee members, instead of talking about expansion right now, have to look at the cards that we have been dealt by the UK Treasury and the Westminster Government, and recognise that we cannot mitigate the impact of every single decision, in particular when £160 million has disappeared just like that.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Social Security (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

Will Mr Balfour give way?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Social Security (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 September 2024

Kevin Stewart

We do not mirror everything that is happening south of the border. For example, look at the investment in the Scottish child payment and the fact that benefits here have risen above inflation, which has not happened south of the border.

However, we also have to deal with the realities. As I said earlier, Mr Balfour is a supporter of the union. That is up to him, but he also has to recognise that the actions of the UK Treasury have implications for spend here in Scotland. When £160 million disappears, that does not leave much room for manoeuvre, and it certainly does not leave any room for the expansion of benefits or for further mitigation. I think that Mr Balfour has to deal with that reality.