The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1652 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Is the use of rebuttable presumptions a suitable mechanism to deal with real-world situations in which the owner does not have control or the person with control is not the owner?
Who wants to come in? I dinna see anybody jumping in to answer these questions.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
You can wait for that, Dr Patrick.
As nobody wanted to come in on that question, I will move on. Is there a need for Scotland-specific technical guidance for the courts on dealing with issues such as control?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
My line of questioning has changed as I have listened to the conversations this morning, because many of the things that I was going to ask about have already been covered.
We want to have perfect legislation in every regard, but there are issues with and arguments around definitions. There have probably been such issues with every piece of legislation that we have dealt with in the Parliament. Mr Gray, last week, Professor Fox and the deputy president of the Supreme Court went through some of the definitions in the bill in great depth. Are you satisfied that the definitions are right? Do you know what definitions have been used in other jurisdictions? Liechtenstein, Switzerland and Jersey have been mentioned. Are the definitions in those jurisdictions different from the ones in the bill?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I recognise that the Liechtenstein legislation will impose regulations on businesses there, but that is not the point that I am making. My point is that primary legislation may be too inflexible, so we may have to create a framework such that we can adapt the legislation regularly through regulation-making powers—through secondary legislation. Has that happened elsewhere?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I would like us to do it all on our own—but that is for another day.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Professor MacPherson, could you answer next?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Well, the sign in front of you says, “Professor MacPherson”, so I would take that as a given.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Grand. Mr Tariq?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Please do, Dr Patrick. Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
All of that makes sense. It is fair to say that we have all struggled a little bit with the bill at points. Some of the evidence that we took last week was enlightening.
The other aspect of this—forgive me, convener, but I am going to mention it—is that members of the bill team have sat through the evidence sessions throughout, which is interesting and unusual, and shows how important this is. Hats off to them for doing that.
We all recognise that this is one part of the jigsaw in relation to legal definitions in Scots property law. We recognise that other changes are required to create an effective regime for digital assets. I am sure that the Scottish Parliament will come on to those in the areas for which it is responsible. There will also have to be changes elsewhere, not only at UK level but internationally.
The bill does not have many regulation-making powers, and it probably should not have many such powers. However, when we come to create other legislation in this area, given the level of change that there is, that legislation will have to be pretty flexible. Rather than relying on changes to primary legislation, which often takes a very long time, do other jurisdictions have regulation-making capacity in order to keep up with the pace of some of that change?