The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1783 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
In your “Striking the Balance” report, you highlight that, in the UK, one in every 215 jobs is in energy. In the north-east of Scotland, it is one in every six. You have said during this evidence session that we need to retain those skills. There has also been talk of ensuring that the supply chain remains in order to deliver net zero. Do you think that, in terms of the level of investment and the logic of all of this, the UK Government has a real grasp on what it needs to do and that, if it does not ensure that there are changes to retain jobs, retain skills and capture investment, that will make it almost impossible for Scotland to deliver on its climate change plan or, as you termed it earlier, emissions reduction framework? Would that be the case?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
I am not so sure about that, Ms Collier, but maybe you can help us by trying to get more companies, including First in Aberdeen, to listen to their customers and not always dictate that they are right—they often cut off their nose to spite their face in terms of the amount of folk they get on buses. I have a question for Mr Solomon, because he seems to have been left out of the equation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Indeed.
How do we get to a point with logistics where we match up the opportunities of rail, sea, water and road freight transportation? Do you think that the UK and Scottish Governments have done enough in that area to see how we can do better?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
My question is on a different point. A number of comments have been made about habit. During the course of our scrutiny of the draft climate change plan, I have said a number of times that it is all a question of delivery. In order to deliver, we will need to change habits. As some folk have stated, human beings do not like change, but sometimes we can sow change if we get things right.
I want to ask about some aspects of delivery. The issue of bus gates in Aberdeen was touched on. There was a social media backlash and many folk were unhappy, but the reality is that some folk were unhappy because they felt that they had not been listened to on what was required. Is it possible that we could put too much into the plan without allowing the flexibilities that would make habit change easier? Perhaps we could hear first from Professor Davis, because he had the most to say about habit.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
You missed out one part of the question, which was about listening to people. We have all agreed that it is difficult to get folk to change, but it is easier to get people to change if they feel that they have been listened to. How do we do that better in order to ensure that we deliver?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Again, the strong message from today is that the Treasury needs to get this right and come up with multiyear funding instead of the current single-year funding that most of us, including the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Government, get. Is that your view, Professor Aldred?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Ms Collier, do you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
I have a question for Ms Collier about bus companies. Should they listen to passengers about the formulation of routes? Would that make a real difference in terms of patronage? I think that it would.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. I have some questions about acquisition and transfer. First, however, I want to clarify something. In some regards, folk watching the evidence sessions will be baffled by some of what is being said—that is the reality—but the simple fact is that the bill is designed only to ensure that digital assets are included in Scots property law. It is that simple, is it not, minister?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
We are having a discussion about what should be a simple bill, and I recognise that the tangents that we have gone off on concern issues that will inevitably crop up in day-to-day life as we move forward.
Gordon MacDonald raised the idea of having a panel of experts to provide guidance. A lot of witnesses have mentioned that and have talked about how it could be used. However, it occurs to me that the issue of how digital assets impinge on other policy areas or legislation is too large to be addressed simply by an expert panel and that what is required is a holistic Government approach. Let us take the carbon credits aspect. Last week, Professor Robbie was a bit exercised by the fact that the carbon credits aspect had been deemed to be out of scope of the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill. The Government will have to pay more attention to that as we move forward, will it not?