Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 27 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1143 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

Our next new petition is PE1984, on introducing the C100 form for child arrangement orders in Scotland, which has been lodged by Amy Stevenson.

The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to reduce the financial barriers that prevent parents from having contact with their children by introducing a Scottish equivalent to the C100 form, with a fixed fee for making applications for child residence or child contact orders.

Members may recall that we previously considered a petition from Amy Stevenson, which focused on the provision of legal aid to parents fighting for access to their children. Amy has followed up on that petition with this call for the introduction of a form similar to the C100 form used in England and Wales when applying to the court for a child arrangement order. Amy suggests that introducing a similar form in Scotland, along with a fixed fee for submitting it, would help to reduce the financial burden on parents seeking child residence or contact orders.

In responding to the petition, the Scottish Government set out the current process for applications to the court for child residence and contact orders, and the fees associated with that.

While accepting that the current procedures for lodging writs and defences in Scotland are viewed as difficult to understand, the Scottish Government highlights a range of issues that it would require to consider before moving to a forms-based system, including criticisms that the C100 form is too lengthy and can be difficult for vulnerable applicants to complete without assistance; the fact that the form may not capture all the relevant issues for the court to consider; and concerns that a forms-based approach may not be focused on the best interests of the child. It is also noted that a forms-based process may reduce costs at the initial application stage but would not rule out the need for applicants to access legal advice at other stages of the process.

The committee has also received submissions from Shared Parenting Scotland and Claire Baker MSP, copies of which are included in our meeting papers. I briefly highlight that Shared Parenting Scotland has suggested that the introduction of a C100 form, or something similar, would remove some barriers for parents who are trying to restore or establish a schedule of contact with their children, but that wider improvements are necessary to provide support to parents in those circumstances.

Do members have any suggestions or comments???

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

Stephanie, just take your time.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

Thank you, Rhoda Grant.

I suggest that the clerks continue to discuss with the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee the possibility of an inquiry, and in the meantime we continue to gather evidence on the matter. We could also invite the petitioner to provide evidence to the committee and invite the Minister for Transport to provide evidence at future committee meetings, if that is acceptable to committee members.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

It is okay. Just take your time.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

Thank you, Fergus Ewing. Is the committee happy with those recommendations?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

I thank Murdo Fraser and Rhoda Grant for their attendance. That concludes the public session of the meeting. Our next meeting will be on Wednesday 8 March.

11:34 Meeting continued in private until 11:57.  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

Thank you. I will move to my colleagues.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

Stephanie, before we draw the evidence session to a close, is there anything that we have missed or that you would like to say?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

Thank you for that. Do we all agree on those recommendations?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

David Torrance

PE1913, which was lodged by Wendy Swain, calls on the Scottish Parliament to?urge the Scottish Government to create a separate department in Social Security Scotland that will fast-track future adult disability payment applications for people with a cancer diagnosis while they are undergoing treatment.

At our previous consideration of the petition, we agreed to write to Social Security Scotland highlighting the concerns of the petitioner and the recommendations for system improvements that are set out in Macmillan Cancer Support’s submission.

In response, Social Security Scotland has confirmed that it will publish quarterly statistics and that the information that is available will be expanded as it continues to collect more data. That will include information on processing times. The response outlines its work to address the issues that are raised by Macmillan Cancer Support’s recommendations.

The petitioner’s recent submission highlights her on-going concern about rejected applications for disability payments through the personal independence payment.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?