Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Filter your results Hide all filters
Displaying 1281 contributions
|
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
New Petitions
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
David Torrance
Could we consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standard orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government has clearly set out that it considers the cut-off date to be appropriate and that it has no plans to review it?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
New Petitions
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee, in the light of the evidence, would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that schools and local authorities should already have established protocols in place to notify parents of incidents affecting their children’s safety and wellbeing. Local authorities have a statutory responsibility in that area; therefore, the Scottish Government’s position is that it is appropriate for notification protocols to be developed and implemented locally.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
New Petitions
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
David Torrance
As you said, we are the sole surviving members of the committee from the start of the session. In light of the evidence, I propose that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that, although the Scottish Government considers that changing the legislation may be feasible, it lacks the evidence to assess whether mandating a single participation process across all local authorities is practical or desirable. The Scottish Government’s view is that it is for local government to consider whether further standards for public participation are required, beyond the provisions in the 2015 act. The open Government partnership is examining how developing a national strategy for public participation can be achieved, as part of the next open Government action plan for 2026-30.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
New Petitions
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
David Torrance
As you said, we are the sole surviving members of the committee from the start of the session. In light of the evidence, I propose that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that, although the Scottish Government considers that changing the legislation may be feasible, it lacks the evidence to assess whether mandating a single participation process across all local authorities is practical or desirable. The Scottish Government’s view is that it is for local government to consider whether further standards for public participation are required, beyond the provisions in the 2015 act. The open Government partnership is examining how developing a national strategy for public participation can be achieved, as part of the next open Government action plan for 2026-30.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
New Petitions
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee, in the light of the evidence, would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that schools and local authorities should already have established protocols in place to notify parents of incidents affecting their children’s safety and wellbeing. Local authorities have a statutory responsibility in that area; therefore, the Scottish Government’s position is that it is appropriate for notification protocols to be developed and implemented locally.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
New Petitions
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
David Torrance
Could we consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standard orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government has clearly set out that it considers the cut-off date to be appropriate and that it has no plans to review it?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
New Petitions
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
David Torrance
As you said, we are the sole surviving members of the committee from the start of the session. In light of the evidence, I propose that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that, although the Scottish Government considers that changing the legislation may be feasible, it lacks the evidence to assess whether mandating a single participation process across all local authorities is practical or desirable. The Scottish Government’s view is that it is for local government to consider whether further standards for public participation are required, beyond the provisions in the 2015 act. The open Government partnership is examining how developing a national strategy for public participation can be achieved, as part of the next open Government action plan for 2026-30.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
New Petitions
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
David Torrance
Could we consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standard orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government has clearly set out that it considers the cut-off date to be appropriate and that it has no plans to review it?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
New Petitions
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee, in the light of the evidence, would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that schools and local authorities should already have established protocols in place to notify parents of incidents affecting their children’s safety and wellbeing. Local authorities have a statutory responsibility in that area; therefore, the Scottish Government’s position is that it is appropriate for notification protocols to be developed and implemented locally.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Energy
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
David Torrance
I would like to push you on that point, cabinet secretary. It looks as though most of the hydrogen production will be down the east coast, because of the concentration of wind farms there, while most of the vast water reserves are on the west coast. As you pointed out, Fife had water restrictions for months last year. If hydrogen is to be an energy source of the future, how can we ensure that the water supply is there and bring in the investors without affecting traditional industries?
