The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1185 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
I agree. If the petitioner wants to resubmit the petition in the next parliamentary session, that would give the committee time to look at it and take evidence.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
I wonder if the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the BID proposals can already include exemptions and reliefs for charities and non-profit organisations. The Scottish Government believes that mandating exemptions by law would create additional layers of bureaucracy and complications.
The Scottish Government believes that the second ask of the petition is practical and achievable and it suggests that it could be incorporated by Scotland’s Improvement Districts in its annual BID survey. In closing the petition, the committee could write to Scotland’s Improvement Districts and encourage it to consider implementing the second ask of the petition as part of its annual survey, as suggested by the Scottish Government.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
I am. I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government does not support the removal of legal protected status for gulls given declining gull populations; the Scottish Government has indicated that NatureScot’s work to support licence applications for gull control will focus on areas where health and safety needs are highest; and that projects such as the gull management pilot led by Highland Council and NatureScot will inform future national best practice in this area.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the committee has progressed the issue raised in the individual petition as far as possible in this parliamentary session and that the committee has raised relevant issues in its thematic evidence-taking session with the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Care.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider closing petitions PE1952, PE2031, PE2038, PE2080 and PE2086 under rule 15.7 of the standing orders, on the basis that the committee has progressed the issues raised in the individual petitions as far as possible in this parliamentary session and that the committee has raised relevant issues as part of a thematic evidence session for the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Care.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
Good morning. What work has been carried out on how to identify women who could be in this situation and should be transferred before they give birth?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
In light of the evidence that has been given to the committee, would the committee consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government has reiterated that it does not designate certain conditions as key clinical priorities, is in the process of developing a long-term conditions framework and has an associated action plan that is designed to improve services for people with long-term conditions, including CKD?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
In light of the evidence before us, would the committee consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government is currently undertaking work with COSLA and the Institute for Fiscal Studies that will inform potential council tax reform proposals in the next parliamentary session? In doing so, we can highlight to the petitioner that the consultation is open until 30 January 2026 and suggest that she can submit a new petition in the next parliamentary session.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government has stated that it has increased funding to local authorities, including for 2025-26; that it is the responsibility of individual local authorities to allocate financial resources on the basis of local needs and priorities, including for women-only homelessness services; and that the Scottish Government has provided some targeted funding to areas with sustained pressures in order to reduce long periods in temporary accommodation.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
David Torrance
On family-centred care, how would you respond to the point that families at the moment do not receive enough financial or care support? Considering the distances that will now be involved, what financial help will the Scottish Government put in place for families who will have to travel those huge distances?