Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 26 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1056 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

On our next panel, we have Dr Ron Cook, who is medical director of NHS 24; Professor Mary Joan Macleod, who is a linical pharmacologist at the University of Aberdeen; and Professor William Whiteley, from the centre for clinical brain sciences at the University of Edinburgh. I welcome you all.

Following on from the discussions of public awareness of stroke symptoms, the committee would like to explore more issues around clinical awareness of symptoms. We will go straight to questions, and I will lead off.

How are less-common stroke symptoms currently considered when assessing patients for potential strokes?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

I will let you go first, Professor Majid.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Thank you. We will suspend briefly.

10:50 Meeting suspended.  

10:55 On resuming—  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

We will close the petition. I remind the petitioners that, if the Government does not make progress, they can lodge a new petition in the next session of Parliament.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Are we agreed?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

I thank both colleagues for their contributions. Do members have any suggestions or comments?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Does everybody agree to the recommendations?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

I will bring in Sophie Bridger, first.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Do other witnesses have any comments?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Our final new petition is PE2124, which was lodged by Eliza Wiper, and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to change the law so that it no longer considers private and workplace pensions to be part of matrimonial property.

The Scottish Parliament information centre briefing explains that pension benefits that are built up during the period of the marriage or civil partnership are considered matrimonial or partnership property. The briefing also notes that a key principle of financial provision on divorce is that the net value of a couple’s matrimonial or partnership property must be shared fairly between them. Fair sharing is usually equal sharing unless special circumstances apply.

The Scottish Government’s response to the petition states that it does not support the aims of the petition. In response to the petitioner’s view that no contribution is made by the partner to the pension, the Scottish Government highlights an indirect contribution made, such as one spouse leaving or reducing paid work to care for children or other family members.

The petitioner’s written submission shares her view that staying at home to look after children is the choice of that individual and highlights the Scottish Government’s proposed early years childcare funding. The petitioner is also keen to receive more data on the issues that are raised in the petition.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?