The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 707 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Gordon MacDonald
One of the things that Kevin Stewart picked up on was the need for private partners. All the annual reports talk about what the deals are trying to achieve. In fact, the Glasgow city deal says that it will
“Lever in an estimated £3.3 billion of private sector investment to support the delivery of the projects”.
How is achieving that leverage measured, given the pressure on the budgets from inflation? I know what you have said about value engineering and how we are dealing with the issue, but are we still going to achieve the leverage from the private sector that we expect to achieve? How is that being measured and reported?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Gordon MacDonald
We touched on this earlier, but my final question is on what happens next. You said that you had started discussions with the UK Government. How concerned are you about funding for future growth deals, bearing in mind that, in September 2024, the UK Government paused the funding for the Argyll and Bute deal? The funding has since been reinstated, but it was paused. Moreover, when Ian Murray was in front of the committee, he would not guarantee multiyear funding. How concerned are you about any new deals, given those two indicators, which suggest that they might not be possible?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Another aspect of the situation is the ability to attract the right mix of skills and labour to fulfil a contract. Unemployment in Scotland is lower than in the rest of the UK, so are businesses able to attract the right quality of staff to fulfil a contract?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Can you say which deal that 75 per cent figure that you have given relates to? Do you have numbers for all 10 deals that are currently up and running?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
I will not mention national insurance increases—[Laughter.] Does Duncan or Carolyn want to add anything?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Can you expand on that? I am looking at the evidence that we received from the supplier development programme, which 23,000 people have registered with. The Edinburgh and south-east Scotland regional deal had 1,400 people attending a meet the buyer event. In your submission, Vikki, you say:
“We recently obtained data which shows incredibly encouraging procurement figures for one of the CRDs. The deal in question shows that local spend averaged at 75.2%.”
I know that you said that there is a mixed picture, but where is the good practice? Is it specific to certain areas?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
You have talked about the massive opportunities that are available to your members in the 10 existing city deals and the two new ones that are on the table. Once your members win a contract, how do they go about fulfilling it? These days there is an awful lot of discussion about value engineering, which is about trying to produce a project that was envisaged 10 years ago under today’s cost pressures. For example, there is the pressure on the tender price as general inflation pushes up the cost of labour and materials. If we look at the Glasgow deal, we can see that £100 of purchasing power now needs to be £135. I am keen to understand how your members cope with general inflation and construction inflation when they are trying to fulfil what they signed up to a few years ago.
Duncan Thorp talked about massive opportunities, so I will go to him first.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
How did you achieve that reduction, given that it is a more complicated process? How are you maintaining that reduction?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
I was going to ask you about the manual processes. If you are committed to continuing performance improvements, what are your target dates for ADP and CDP? Secondly, given your commitment to improved performance, why has the processing time for the job start payment increased by 50 per cent from 16 days to 24?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
You are saying that that is not the way that you would want the computer systems to operate.
One of the other points in the Audit Scotland report was:
“Social Security Scotland and the Scottish Government Social Security Programme do not have the capacity to make all required improvements to the benefit case management system. ... an independent third party”
will
“conduct a digital maturity assessment.”
Where are we with that? What is the current situation?