The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 349 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
I am glad that Professor Higgins raised that example, because I was going to raise the issue of the axing of the Billy Sloan show and the Iain Anderson show. I am sure that I am not the only MSP who has been contacted by a great number of constituents who are concerned about the impact that that will have, not just on listeners but on the opportunity to profile new and emerging artists in Scotland and give them exposure for the first time. That is a retrograde step.
We have just discussed the need for autonomy in BBC Scotland, but those decisions appear to have been made by BBC Scotland about the future of BBC Radio Scotland. Yes, there might be questions about autonomy, resources and so on, but is BBC Radio Scotland making the right decisions in that respect? Your answer just now suggests that you would agree that it is not. Clearly, there are issues about autonomy and decisions that are made on programming in Scotland.
09:15Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
For the Scottish Government to say that it was not informed of the UK-US trade deal when there is evidence to suggest that extensive discussions were on-going about it shows that we need to be a bit more caveated about our statements in relation to intergovernmental relations.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
That information would be helpful, because we are currently talking about perceptions. It would be good to get full information on which ministers, across different departments, are meeting and when.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
That would be good.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
There has been a lot of talk about perceptions and vibes. I asked the cabinet secretary earlier about the number of meetings because we wanted to establish some facts and because I thought that it would be helpful to have that information. However, in his written submission to the committee, the cabinet secretary said:
“The Scottish Government was not informed of the proposed UK-US trade deal ahead of the announcement.”
I know that he said earlier that he does not have responsibility for intergovernmental relations, but is the cabinet secretary’s position and understanding that the Scottish Government was not informed of the proposed deal?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
Good morning. Mr Kerr cited the UK Government’s response to the committee, which sets out that there have been around 25 interministerial standing committee meetings and interministerial group meetings since the new UK Government was elected. You mentioned that other meetings happen outwith the bilateral meetings and that requests are made. You mentioned two examples of meetings that have not yet been arranged. Outwith those 25 meetings, how many other bilateral meetings have taken place between Scottish Government ministers and the UK Government?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
Well, I was not involved in the discussions either, so I do not really know the extent to which discussions about the UK-US trade deal took place between the Scottish Government and the UK Government. However, I do know that, after a freedom of information request back in September, correspondence between the Scottish Government and the UK Government on the UK-US trade deal—email exchanges between the Minister for Trade Policy, Douglas Alexander, and the Minister for Business, Richard Lochhead, the First Minister and the Deputy First Minister, and between Scottish Government and UK Government officials—was published. Just from that FOI request, we know that discussions were on-going between UK and Scottish Government officials on that particular issue. That will not be the sum total, I am sure, of the discussions that were happening in relation to the UK-US trade deal, but you talked about nuance earlier—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
I agree with the cabinet secretary on the importance of substance.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
Is it your responsibility to gather the data across Government on how many meetings there have been between UK Government ministers and Scottish Government ministers?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Neil Bibby
You said that the review called for the digitisation and streamlining of operations. Is there a specific measurable target that you think should be set to ensure that more payments are made on time or more quickly? Is there a specific timeframe for that?