The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 632 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Griffin
Thanks, convener. Good morning, cabinet secretary. We talk about the transformation agenda, and I wonder about the Government’s understanding of transformation. What does transformation mean, what will the transformation process look like in local government and what will transformed local government look like at the end of the road?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Griffin
I am interested in a particular area of transformation. I do not know whether the cabinet secretary is a follower or watcher of Tom Hunter and Willie Haughey’s podcast, but Tom Hunter made a commitment on that podcast to fund an AI-powered planning portal for the Scottish public sector. Has the Government looked at that, and has it been in contact with Tom Hunter and started discussions or negotiations on that offer?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Griffin
Thanks, convener. We talk about the transformation agenda, but what is your understanding of that agenda in local government? I come to Councillor Hagmann first.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Griffin
I have a final question on a significant transformation that has taken place already: integration joint boards. IJBs were supposed to allow resources to be moved and shared between health boards and councils, and that that was a spend-to-save initiative to reduce delayed discharge and keep people healthy at home. However, it seems to be the case that councils spend and health boards save. That is my impression and understanding from councillors in my area.
How are integration joint boards and that significant piece of transformation interpreted? Has it worked as planned? Has it allowed resources to flow between councils and the national health service and, as important, in the opposite direction, too?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Griffin
Councillor Hagmann mentioned relaunching the digital strategy with Ivan McKee in the Scottish Government. That leads nicely on to my second question, which is about how the local government reform and transformation agenda sits within the wider public service reform agenda of the Scottish Government. Is that being done hand in hand with the Scottish Government? Is there co-working on and co-reform of the entire public service sphere, or are local authorities doing it on their own as a result of being forced into that by budget cuts?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Griffin
How does the local government transformation agenda fit into the larger public service reform agenda of the Scottish Government? During the earlier evidence session, we heard examples from Councillor Heddle, who was involved in presenting with Ivan McKee at the Scottish Government’s public service reform day. How closely linked are the Government’s reform agenda and local government’s transformation programmes? How close is the working on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Mark Griffin
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I come back to the target of 110,000 affordable homes by 2032. Up until June this year, almost 30,000 homes had been built. The Government’s plan is to build 39,000 homes over the next four years. By my maths, that leaves a ballpark figure of 40,000 affordable homes to be built in the final two years. How is the Government planning on ramping up supply from around 40,000 homes over four years to 40,000 homes in the final two years?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Mark Griffin
Thank you.
The new ambition to increase all-tenure delivery by 10 per cent a year is a really welcome change in Government policy. The sector and parties have been calling for it, too—it is really important to get an all-tenure target as well as that crucial affordable homes target. How will the Government facilitate the hitting of that 10 per cent target? A 10 per cent increase is a relative target. To help our understanding, on what baseline are you measuring the increase?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Mark Griffin
Is the cabinet secretary able to set out the detail of how that Government commitment of £4.9 billion will be spent? Will it be in the form of a capital grant? Will it be partially leveraged from the private sector? Will it be in the form of loans? Will you paint a picture of what that £4.9 billion comprises and how it will be spent?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Mark Griffin
From your work with the 32 local authorities, do you get a sense of why sickness absence levels are so high? Are there any recurring themes? Is there a shrinking workforce, which is putting pressure on staff and leading to absence? Is it pay restraint in local government that is causing problems? Does the cause really depend on each individual local authority’s situation?