The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 605 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Mark Griffin
Before I ask the minister a couple of questions on the adoption of local development plans, I have a supplementary question about his comment that 164,000 homes across Scotland have planning permission but have not yet been built. Sir Robert Chote, who is chair of the UK Statistics Authority, wrote to Scottish ministers on 6 March to say that the data for that claim
“remains unclear based on the limited information”
and that future use of that figure
“should clearly indicate that this is a high-level estimate.”
Has the minister reflected on that assessment from the UK Statistics Authority? Is it helpful to use that figure as though it were a matter of fact?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Mark Griffin
In previous national planning documents, the now-famous policy 16(f) was in place to allow for additional land to be released when local development plans were getting towards the end of their cycle or were becoming close to being out of date because the land that had been released in previous rounds had not been effective. That speaks to the amount of land that the Government has said is available but has not been built on.
If there are concerns about authorities not meeting the deadline for getting new local development plans in place, is it a missed opportunity not to have some form of old policy 16(f) to allow additional land to be released for housing before the new development plans come into force?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Mark Griffin
Do you know the reasons for the failures at gate check? Have local authorities had a failure of understanding such that they did not include the information that ministers or officials would expect? Is anything going out to local authorities to clarify the level of detail that you expect to be in the plans?
10:00Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Mark Griffin
At no point in your answers to two previous questions did you say that the figure was a high-level estimate. It was stated as a matter of fact and not—
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Mark Griffin
It is helpful to have that clarification on the record after the figure has been stated as a matter of fact previously.
On local development plans, we have heard concerns from several witnesses that LDP evidence reports have been rejected at gate check and returned to planning authorities for further work. Is the gate-check process working as expected? Can more be done to streamline it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Mark Griffin
Concerns have been expressed about the impact of out-of-date local development plans. Minister, how long do you expect it to take for the new local development plans to be drafted and adopted? Does the Government have in mind a set date for all 34 to have been drafted and adopted by?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Mark Griffin
My second question deals more generally with the introduction of NPF4 and all the policies that it contains. In the context of the housing emergency, do you think that we will deliver more houses under the NPF4 framework than we would have done under the previous version?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Mark Griffin
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Mark Griffin
Good morning. Pamela Clifford, how has the introduction of the new minimum all-tenure housing land requirement—MATHLR—figures in NPF4 impacted on the identification of land for housing?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Mark Griffin
Do you have an idea of the figures in the various planning authorities? The Scottish Government has been very clear that what is set out in the NPF4 is a minimum, so have planning authorities been bringing forward the minimum plus 1 per cent or plus 10, 20 or 30 per cent, for example? Do you have an idea of what each planning authority is doing?