The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1491 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
That was very helpful. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
SOLACE’s submission on the bill specifically mentions
“creating a system that incentivises formal care measures”.
How could the bill be changed to address that concern?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
What would be a more accurate costing?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
You mentioned decluttering, and then you outlined lots of different bits of legislation that will be brought under the bill. Are the good transition principles, which are now in place, not being delivered? Is that the honest answer here, and is that what the committee needs to follow up on? In other words, what does a good transition look like in practice for young people accessing services? For example, I have highlighted the removal of compulsory supervision orders as a trigger for people just to say, “You’re on your own now.” How can that change?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
Ms Allison, you have outlined the workforce challenge. I would point out that the concept of a national social work agency sat within the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill, as it was originally called, and is being progressed only now, at the end of this session of the Parliament and at the midway point of delivering the Promise.
Having spoken to social workers, I worry that there does not seem to be much space for additional work to come their way. What do you think could be a better model for delivering outcomes? The young people to whom I spoke last night suggested having teams in services—be it health, housing or education—that would have some understanding and would be a point of contact. The university sector is probably in a better place in that respect. How will we meet that workforce challenge? In the time that I have been in the Parliament, social work has not been in a good space, and we are about to add more to its workload.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
I wanted to ask about the register of foster carers. I know that Maree Allison mentioned it earlier, but I note that, in its response to the committee, Social Work Scotland has said that the register has the potential to create additional tasks for agencies and local authorities, while the Care Inspectorate and others have highlighted the need to ensure that the register does not exacerbate the decline in the numbers of foster carers, which is a point that John Trainer has touched on, too.
What assurances would you seek on how such a register would work in practice? The young people whom we spoke to last night made quite interesting points about what they saw it doing, such as tracking people moving across local authorities and ensuring that training was documented. In fact, all of the young people whom I spoke to said that it would provide an opportunity to highlight good practice and to celebrate foster carers themselves. What are your views on that and how the Government might improve the proposals? Perhaps Maree Allison can answer that first.
12:15Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
That is just in one local authority, though.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
Good morning. I want to ask a number of questions about aftercare. In its submission to the committee following our call for views, SOLACE cautioned against
“creating a system that incentivises formal care measures”
as a requirement for accessing support, and it suggested that assessment of need would be more appropriate. How could the bill be amended to reflect that? How can the system ensure that the needs around aftercare are met?
I will bring in Mr Savege first.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
You will be aware of the case in Aberdeenshire—it was in the Sunday Post—involving Callie Thomson, who had been in formal secure care since the age of 14. When she was discharged from the Rossie institution in Montrose, Aberdeenshire Council declared her homeless and she was placed in homelessness services without a care package. How is the Promise delivering the change that is needed for Callie?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Miles Briggs
Good morning. I want to ask a few questions about aftercare. We had a good session last night with some care-experienced young people, and I want to ask about the principle of care-experienced young people accessing support. Social Work Scotland’s response to the committee’s call for views expressed significant concerns about the proposal in the bill around assessment, given that the group concerned would be huge and it would be difficult to resource the necessary work, especially as we have no good relevant data or numbers. Therefore, I am interested in what the witnesses would like to see in the bill, especially around eligibility for aftercare assessments and support.
I will put on record that, last night, a few young people said that they had been trying to progress moves towards the establishment of an opt-out system, which has not been taken forward in the bill. I would like to hear people’s comments on that, too.
That is a two-part question. John Trainer, could you respond first?
11:00