The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1515 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
I will return to the register of foster carers, which the bill proposes and which is to be set out in regulations at a later date. What is your assessment of those proposals? How do you think that they can be improved?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
Does anyone else want to add anything on the register?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
That is helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
I have a question on the register of foster carers. I put the same question to the witnesses at last week’s session. There has been some welcome comment in response to the committee’s call for views in support of a register, but how do you think it will work in practice, given that the detail will be set out in regulations at a later date? What is your assessment of the proposals for a register in the bill, and how could they be improved?
Does anyone have a view on that? I know that we have witnesses on the next panel who will have views on the proposals.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
Good morning to the witnesses. I thank you for joining us.
I have a couple of questions. I will start now and continue later in the session. My first question relates specifically to aftercare, which we heard some organisations’ views on last week. Who Cares? Scotland stated in its submission that the aftercare provisions in the bill could go even further—I agree with that—and others have raised concerns with the committee around estimated costs. How might those provisions be improved, and how can the Scottish Government ensure that they are adequately resourced?
I mentioned Who Cares? Scotland, so I ask Laura Pasternak to start, and then anyone else can come in.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
Thank you for that answer. We have heard about the removal of compulsory supervision orders as an example of such a cliff edge.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
Thank you for that. Last week, we also heard that the use of the word “aftercare” in this is problematic.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
I have raised the issue of children and young people in kinship care with ministers and on panels. To go back to Duncan Dunlop’s point, the bill is not ambitious enough for that group of young people. What are your views on children in kinship care arrangements? Given that we will be able to lodge amendments at stage 2 on the issue, how could it be corrected?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Miles Briggs
Thank you for that. Does anyone else want to come in on that point?