The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
We are at a difficult point in the stage 2 proceedings, because we are about to go into another group, which will require debate and a series of votes. That would take us well beyond the time that I have allowed for our meeting this morning, so I propose that we hold it there. We have not got as far as we hoped, and we will have to work out what we are going to do as regards continuing our stage 2 consideration of the bill. We have that to look forward to. Cabinet secretary, we will be in contact with you once we have discussed our work programme.
I close the public part of the meeting.
12:17 Meeting continued in private until 12:53.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you, cabinet secretary.
Although Mark Ruskell moved Ariane Burgess’s amendment 310, Ariane has now finished with her other committee business and is here. We have agreed that Mark Ruskell will sum up the debate and press or seek to withdraw amendment 310, but please do not take it as a slight that I am ignoring you, Ariane—I know that you are here.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Does any other member wish to speak?
It is a bit unfair to ask this of you, Mercedes, because although you spoke to it, it is Rhoda Grant’s amendment. My concern is that amendment 341 seeks to move crofting outwith the crofting counties, which has huge implications. If Rhoda Grant were here, I would ask her what the implications of that would be for the costing and running of crofting in Scotland and whether that has been taken into account. I suspect that it has not, because that change would increase the costs of the croft house grant scheme and the cost of the Crofting Commission, which causes me huge concern. Perhaps the cabinet secretary, who will be speaking next, can allude to those problems, unless you particularly want to, Mercedes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Cabinet secretary—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you. I think that my view is quite clear: what people do with the land is more important than who actually owns it. In the past, I have worked for people who brought a huge amount of money into Scotland, invested in Scotland and used local firms to do all the work. To me, that is good. It also delivered on the things that Governments require, such as public access and deer management plans. I am completely without an opinion as to who owns the land; what matters to me is the way that it is managed and run and whether it delivers what the Government is trying to achieve.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I would be happy to talk to Mercedes Villalba about how compulsory purchase could be done in cases where it was clear that there were bad land management practices, provided that the provision was not limited to private landowners but included environmental groups, too. Provided that it was a broad-spectrum provision, I would be happy to work with her on that.
I have no other comments—those are my concerns with the amendments.
As no one else has anything to say, the floor is yours, cabinet secretary.
09:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I hear what you are saying, Ariane. However, my concern is that a purchaser adopting the plan of a previous owner might not be a rationale for success. For example, an estate just south of Aviemore was planted with trees, but they have all died, because they were not planted in a suitable location. If that were to be in the management plan, you would be tying the next owner to planting more trees there, just so that they could die. I do not think that those things necessarily tie in.
It would also adversely affect people who wished to buy. For example, we visited what had been a sporting estate south of Perthshire—I cannot remember its name—where the new owners had stopped all the sporting and were planting trees, creating a wind farm and fencing out all the deer, with the aim of meeting the target. Again, had they been tied into sticking to the previous land management plan, none of that would have been possible.
Mr Doris, did you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call Tim Eagle to speak to amendment 398 and other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There is an ability under compulsory purchase provisions for the Government to compulsorily purchase areas of land where there is a significant community interest. Has the member had discussions with the Government to find out whether it feels that those provisions are sufficient and, therefore, whether these amendments are needed? To my knowledge, it appears that the Government and councils have never used that provision in the past.